2013
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/409/1/012020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Rays, Solar Activity and the Climate

Abstract: Abstract. Although it is generally believed that the increase in the mean global surface temperature since industrialisation is caused by the increase in green house gases in the atmosphere, some people cite solar activity, either directly or through its effect on cosmic rays, as an underestimated contributor to such global warming. In this paper a simplified version of the standard picture of the role of greenhouse gases in causing the global warming since industrialisation is described. The conditions necess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first 150 Ma, we assigned arbitrary a GCR fluence of 1; for the time interval 150–300 Ma, we assigned a GCR fluence of either 1, 1.5, or 3; for the time interval 300–450 Ma, we again assigned a value of 1, and so on. The upper two panels are for a constant GCR intensity (always 1), the middle two panels are for periodic GCR fluence variations of a factor of 1.5, that is, roughly in accord with the proposal by Sloan and Wolfendale (2013a), and the lower two panels are for periodic GCR fluence variations of a factor of 3, as proposed by Shaviv (, ). As a period we always use 150 Ma, close to the value proposed by Shaviv (, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Basicssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the first 150 Ma, we assigned arbitrary a GCR fluence of 1; for the time interval 150–300 Ma, we assigned a GCR fluence of either 1, 1.5, or 3; for the time interval 300–450 Ma, we again assigned a value of 1, and so on. The upper two panels are for a constant GCR intensity (always 1), the middle two panels are for periodic GCR fluence variations of a factor of 1.5, that is, roughly in accord with the proposal by Sloan and Wolfendale (2013a), and the lower two panels are for periodic GCR fluence variations of a factor of 3, as proposed by Shaviv (, ). As a period we always use 150 Ma, close to the value proposed by Shaviv (, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Basicssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…By assuming that there is a causal link between GCR intensity and global warming, Erlykin et al (2009) determined that the long-term variation is expected to be less than 0.07°C since 1956, which would be less than 14% of the observed global warming. Other studies have confirmed these results (e.g., Sloan andWolfendale 2008, 2013a;Sloan 2013). Ormes (2017) on the other hand, concluded that there is no identifiable correlation between cloud coverage and GCR intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Svensmark and Friis‐Christensen (1997) suggested that cosmic rays play a major role in climate change through atmospheric ionization and increased formation of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). CCN exert a strong effect on the world's mean temperature (Sloan and Wolfendale, 2013), implying possible interplay between cosmic ray and temperature which is directly linked to sunshine hours and relative humidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that GCR is a proxy index for solar activity. Used as proxies for solar activity 4 6 , these research showed that GCR variations are constantly out-of-phase with SSN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The physical mechanism controlling the coupling of solar magnetic activity and climate is the incidence of GCRs which act as nucleation particles for cloud formation. Recently, an evidence of contribution of GCR to climate was presented in a scientific study 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%