2012
DOI: 10.5194/npg-19-351-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic rays and stochastic magnetic reconnection in the heliotail

Abstract: Abstract. Galactic cosmic rays are believed to be generated by diffusive shock acceleration processes in Supernova Remnants, and the arrival direction is likely determined by the distribution of their sources throughout the Galaxy, in particular by the nearest and youngest ones. Transport to Earth through the interstellar medium is expected to affect the cosmic ray properties as well. However, the observed anisotropy of TeV cosmic rays and its energy dependence cannot be explained with diffusion models of part… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each region is approximately 200-300 AU wide, roughly the proton gyroradius at TeV energies in typical Galactic magnetic fields. Cosmic rays, especially with high Z, might be affected by these magnetized regions, in particular those produced in the previous solar cycle and just past the solar system toward the heliotail (Lazarian & Desiati 2010;Desiati & Lazarian 2012, 2013. We should observe an 11-year modulation, although not necessarily in sync with the current solar cycle.…”
Section: Time Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each region is approximately 200-300 AU wide, roughly the proton gyroradius at TeV energies in typical Galactic magnetic fields. Cosmic rays, especially with high Z, might be affected by these magnetized regions, in particular those produced in the previous solar cycle and just past the solar system toward the heliotail (Lazarian & Desiati 2010;Desiati & Lazarian 2012, 2013. We should observe an 11-year modulation, although not necessarily in sync with the current solar cycle.…”
Section: Time Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental determination of small angular scale anisotropy is generally performed by filtering out the largescale modulations from the observed arrival direction distribution, thus retaining all structures with large angular gradients. Some of the small-scale anisotropy features seem to be correlated to regions in the sky where the global anisotropy has large variations (see Desiati & Lazarian 2013) or may be an effect of re-acceleration by magnetic reconnection processes in the tail of the heliosphere (Lazarian & Desiati 2010;Desiati & Lazarian 2012). However, globally, the observed small-scale anisotropy may appear to be rather randomly structured and, therefore, possibly a natural consequence of cosmic-ray propagation in the local turbulent magnetic field in the presence of a global anisotropy (Giacinti & Sigl 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If confirmed, such observations might indicate that the small fraction of cosmic rays from this narrow angular region might be reaccelerated in magnetic reconnection processes occurring in between the unipolar magnetic domains generated by solar cycles (Lazarian and Desiati, 2010;Desiati and Lazarian, 2012). Such reacceleration processes would only involve a negligible fraction of the total turbulent energy transported by the solar wind across the heliotail.…”
Section: Heliospheric Influence On Tev Cosmic Raysmentioning
confidence: 83%