2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02683416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiparameter fit to experimental data of ambient dose equivalent rates (12,13) Vertical cut-off rigidity , .10 GeV (16) , normalised at 10.6 GeV (17) Vertical cut-off rigidity (18) and non-vertical cutoff rigidities (19) ICRP 60 (1) and Pelliccioni et al PCAIRE Semi-empirical: measurement-based with modeled E/H*(10) conversion (20 -23) Vertical cut-off rigidity (21) ICRP 60…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiparameter fit to experimental data of ambient dose equivalent rates (12,13) Vertical cut-off rigidity , .10 GeV (16) , normalised at 10.6 GeV (17) Vertical cut-off rigidity (18) and non-vertical cutoff rigidities (19) ICRP 60 (1) and Pelliccioni et al PCAIRE Semi-empirical: measurement-based with modeled E/H*(10) conversion (20 -23) Vertical cut-off rigidity (21) ICRP 60…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1: Fits of the modified Gaisser parameterization to experimental data in the low energy regime between θ = 0 and θ = 87 • . The experimental data are taken from References [8], [20]- [30]. The modified Gaisser parameterization is given by Eqs.…”
Section: Appendix A: Technical Details Of the Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of Ze/ (Z is the charge number) corresponds to the average energy loss of cosmic rays inside the heliosphere. Here we consider the nucleonic ratio of heavier particles including a-particles to protons in the interstellar medium as 0.3 (Gaisser & Stanev 2010) similarly to Kovaltsov et al (2012). The model with the corresponding parametrization of LIS provides very good fitting of the measured spectra (for details see Usoskin et al 2005, and references therein).…”
Section: Gcr Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model with the corresponding parametrization of LIS provides very good fitting of the measured spectra (for details see Usoskin et al 2005, and references therein). For the computations, a realistic mass composition of the primary GCR (Gaisser & Stanev 2010) is assumed, where the contribution of heavier species is scaled to that for a-particles (Usoskin & Kovaltsov 2006;Mishev & Velinov 2011;Kovaltsov et al 2012). …”
Section: Gcr Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%