1952
DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1952.273872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Radio Noise Intensities in the VHF Band

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eq uation (17) illustr ates t he defini tion of L p , the p7'opagation l088, i. e., th e tr ansmi ssion loss expected if the a ntennas h ad gains an d circui t resistances the sam e as if th ey were in free space. More generally, L, and Lr are defin ed as (18) wh ere r' is th e act ual r esistance of th e a ntenn a in th e presence of its environmen t and r f is th e radiation resistance i t wo uld h ave h ad if i t were in fr ee space, ~Wh e n we note th at L, a nd L r m ay var y s ubstan tially from one antenn a in stall ation to th e n ext, depending upon th e circui t losses, polar ization, ground co ndi tions, wheth er 0 1' n ot a ground screen is used, and upon oth er environmental factors s uch as th e presence of trees 01' ovcrhead wir es, it becom es clear why it is de irable to separate these compon ents from the system loss and to have a propagation loss, L 7 J) independent of these antenna •environmental conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Antenna Environment And Definition Of Propamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eq uation (17) illustr ates t he defini tion of L p , the p7'opagation l088, i. e., th e tr ansmi ssion loss expected if the a ntennas h ad gains an d circui t resistances the sam e as if th ey were in free space. More generally, L, and Lr are defin ed as (18) wh ere r' is th e act ual r esistance of th e a ntenn a in th e presence of its environmen t and r f is th e radiation resistance i t wo uld h ave h ad if i t were in fr ee space, ~Wh e n we note th at L, a nd L r m ay var y s ubstan tially from one antenn a in stall ation to th e n ext, depending upon th e circui t losses, polar ization, ground co ndi tions, wheth er 0 1' n ot a ground screen is used, and upon oth er environmental factors s uch as th e presence of trees 01' ovcrhead wir es, it becom es clear why it is de irable to separate these compon ents from the system loss and to have a propagation loss, L 7 J) independent of these antenna •environmental conditions.…”
Section: Influence Of the Antenna Environment And Definition Of Propamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Using the results in a rece nt paper by Cottony and JollieI' [18], values of f a may also readily be determined for cosmic radio noise simply by dividing their eq uivalent blackbody temperatures by 288.48. It should be noted tbat f a will usually be somewhat d epend ent upon the r eceiving an te nna direc tivity and the published values of fa quoted above correspond to reception on a short vertical electric antenna in references [16] and [17] and to reception on a horizontal half-wave electri c dipole in [18].…”
Section: Percentage Of Time That a Desired Signal Is Free Of Interfermentioning
confidence: 99%