2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic censorship and Weak Gravity Conjecture in the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton theory

Abstract: We explore the cosmic censorship in the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory following Wald's thought experiment to destroy a black hole by throwing in a test particle. We discover that at probe limit the extremal charged dilaton black hole could be destroyed by a test particle with specific energy.Nevertheless the censorship is well protected if backreaction or self-force is included. At the end, we discuss an interesting connection between Hoop Conjecture and Weak Gravity Conjecture. *

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown in [32] that the old version of the gedanken experiment can destroy the static dilaton black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory if the backreaction or self-energy is ignored. However, in this paper, we following a similar consideration in [27], we showed that after the second-order perturbation inequality are taken into account, the charged static dilaton black hole cannot be overcharged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is shown in [32] that the old version of the gedanken experiment can destroy the static dilaton black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory if the backreaction or self-energy is ignored. However, in this paper, we following a similar consideration in [27], we showed that after the second-order perturbation inequality are taken into account, the charged static dilaton black hole cannot be overcharged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all of the charge added to the spacetime falls through the horizon, this flux is just equal to the total perturbed charge of the black hole, δ Q flux = δ Q. Combining these observations yields the following formula relating the perturbed parameters of the black hole spacetime: (32) where˜ is the corresponding volume element on the horizon, which is defined by ε ebcd = −4k [eεbcd] with the future-directed normal vector k a ∝ ξ a on the horizon. Then, according to the null energy condition δ T ab k a k b ≥ 0, (32) yields the inequality…”
Section: Perturbation Inequalities Of Gedanken Exprimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a similar consideration to [27], here we also assume the Kerr-Sen black hole is linearly stable to perturbations. That is to say, any source-free solution to the linearized equation of motion (35) will approach a perturbation towards another Kerr-Sen black hole at sufficiently late times. According to the above setup, it is not difficult to see that T ab (λ) and j a (λ) are vanishing except in a compact region of the future horizon.…”
Section: Perturbation Inequalities Of Gedanken Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we would like to analyze the result found in [35] for the old version of gedanken experiments. In that scene, we would like to neglect the O(λ 2 ) term.…”
Section: Gedanken Experiments To Destroy a Nearly Extremal Kerr-sementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There it was shown that test particles cannot overcharge or overspin an extremal Kerr-Newman black hole into a naked singularity. Following Wald many similar tests of Wccc were applied to black holes in vacuum and Einstein-Maxwell theory involving test particles [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], and fields [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The stability of event horizons in the asymptotically anti-de Sitter case was also evaluated by perturbing the black holes with test particles and fields [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%