2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coseismic and initial post-seismic slip of the 2009Mw6.3 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy, from GPS measurements

Abstract: S U M M A R YHere we report the preliminary results of GPS data inversions for coseismic and initial afterslip distributions of the M w 6.3 2009 April 6 L'Aquila earthquake. Coseismic displacements of continuous and survey-style GPS sites, show that the earthquake ruptured a planar SW-dipping normal fault with ∼0.6 m average slip and an estimated moment of 3.9 × 10 18 Nm. Geodetic data agree with the seismological and geological information pointing out the Paganica fault, as the causative structure of the mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

21
145
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(36 reference statements)
21
145
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). All published coseismic slip models agree that most coseismic slip -up to 1.0 m -occurred between 9-10 and 3-4 km in depth, whereas slip in the shallowest crust was found to be 0.1 m or less over most of the fault length (e.g., Atzori et al, 2009;Cirella et al, 2009;Cheloni et al, 2010;D'Agostino et al, 2012;Cheloni et al, 2014). Shallower slip was documented mainly near the northern end of the fault (D'Agostino et al, 2012), about 3 km to the northeast of L'Aquila (Fig.…”
Section: The 6 April 2009 Earthquakesupporting
confidence: 51%
“…4). All published coseismic slip models agree that most coseismic slip -up to 1.0 m -occurred between 9-10 and 3-4 km in depth, whereas slip in the shallowest crust was found to be 0.1 m or less over most of the fault length (e.g., Atzori et al, 2009;Cirella et al, 2009;Cheloni et al, 2010;D'Agostino et al, 2012;Cheloni et al, 2014). Shallower slip was documented mainly near the northern end of the fault (D'Agostino et al, 2012), about 3 km to the northeast of L'Aquila (Fig.…”
Section: The 6 April 2009 Earthquakesupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Imaging of the source (Anzidei et al, 2009;Atzori et al, 2009;Cirella et al, , 2012Pino and Di Luccio, 2009;Cheloni et al, 2010;Scognamiglio et al, 2010) highlights a complex rupture history composed of two main slip releases and controlled by spatial variations of material properties along the fault Lucente et al, 2010;Di Stefano, Chiarabba, et al, 2011) as well as temporal variations (Lucente et al, 2010;Zaccarelli et al, 2011). The source characteristics are partly responsible for the southeast directivity (Pino and Di Luccio, 2009;Akinci et al, 2010) and the unusually high levels of strong acceleration recorded close to L'Aquila city Çelebi et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details on fault geometry and slip distribution were derived from the modeling of Global Position System (GPS), synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data [Walters et al, 2009;Atzori et al, 2009;Anzidei et al, 2009;Cheloni et al, 2010;Lanari et al, 2010] and by the joint inversion of strong motion and geodetic data [Cirella et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features have been interpreted as a direct expression of fault rupture. 3D laser scan technology (TLS) and GPS data located postseismic deformation around the main slip patches [Wilkinson et al, 2010;Cheloni et al, 2010]. [8] There are still open questions concerning the role played by the preexisting compressional structures on the evolution and geometry of Quaternary complex normal fault system and consequently on the deformation style of the central Apennine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%