2008 Real-Time Systems Symposium 2008
DOI: 10.1109/rtss.2008.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coscheduling of CPU and I/O Transactions in COTS-Based Embedded Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge of the deterministic location of the preemption points can be exploited to simplify the analysis of the cache state at each point, so improving the estimation of the preemption overhead. Specific experiments on CRPD showed that WCET can increase up to 40% in the presence of preemptions, with respect to a fully nonpreemptive execution [26].…”
Section: This Work Has Been Supported In Part By the European Commissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of the deterministic location of the preemption points can be exploited to simplify the analysis of the cache state at each point, so improving the estimation of the preemption overhead. Specific experiments on CRPD showed that WCET can increase up to 40% in the presence of preemptions, with respect to a fully nonpreemptive execution [26].…”
Section: This Work Has Been Supported In Part By the European Commissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply functions have been used, possibly under different names in different contexts [e.g. service curves in network/real-time calculus (Cruz 1991;Baccelli et al 1992;Thiele et al 2000)], to model the availability of different types of resource: processing time of a single (Mok et al 2001;Lipari and Bini 2003;Shin and Lee 2003) or multi-core (Bini 2009;Xu et al 2015) platform, network (Cruz 1991;Almeida et al 2002), memory (Yun et al 2016;Åkesson and Goossens 2011), and I/O (Pellizzoni et al 2008). However, this is the first instance in which a supply function is constructed based on the experimental execution trace.…”
Section: The Supply Analysis Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to our work, theirs does not address refresh side-effects on predictability. Our work is rather in the spirit of prior work on increasing the predictability of hardware peripherals for real-time software, such as bus-level I/O transaction control [18]. Predator [1] is a predictable SDRAM memory controller using a hardwarebased approach to achieve a guaranteed lower bound on efficiency and an upper bound on the latency in the presence of SDRAM refreshes and multiple users sharing the same SDRAM.…”
Section: Reduction In Dram Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%