2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COS-Weak: probing the CGM using analogues of weak Mg ii absorbers at z < 0.3

Abstract: We present a sample of 34 weak metal line absorbers at z < 0.3 selected by the simultaneous > 3σ detections of the Si λ1260 and C λ1334 absorption lines, with W r (Si ) < 0.2 Å and W r (C ) < 0.3 Å, in archival HST /COS spectra. Our sample increases the number of known low-z "weak absorbers" by a factor of > 5. The column densities of H and low-ionization metal lines obtained from Voigt profile fitting are used to build simple photoionization models. The inferred densities and line of sight thicknesses of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(204 reference statements)
4
44
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3.1) suggests log [N(H i) (cm −2 )] 17.25. In addition, the restframe equivalent width of W r (C ii 1335) = 95 ± 21 mÅ (see Figure 2) makes this a weak Mg ii class of absorber which are associated with sub-Lyman limit systems (Churchill & Charlton 1999;Rigby et al 2002;Narayanan et al 2005;Muzahid et al 2018). Considering both these, the true column density is presumably closer to, but lower than log [N(H i) (cm −2 )] ≤ 17.25.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3.1) suggests log [N(H i) (cm −2 )] 17.25. In addition, the restframe equivalent width of W r (C ii 1335) = 95 ± 21 mÅ (see Figure 2) makes this a weak Mg ii class of absorber which are associated with sub-Lyman limit systems (Churchill & Charlton 1999;Rigby et al 2002;Narayanan et al 2005;Muzahid et al 2018). Considering both these, the true column density is presumably closer to, but lower than log [N(H i) (cm −2 )] ≤ 17.25.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…QSO names (5) and redshifts (6) are from Monroe et al (2016). The r 500 values (4), normalized clustocentric impact parameters of the QSO sightlines (7) and absorber redshifts (8) are from Muzahid et al (2018).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallicity of the gas is fixed to one-third solar, and is the same for both the accreting gas and the galactic outflows. Outflows are expected to be metal-enriched compared to mostly-pristine cosmological accretion (Muzahid et al 2015;Chisholm et al 2018;Christensen et al 2018), so this fixed metallicity is an idealized simplification, but aligns with some CGM studies that find a metallicity ∼ 0.3Z (Prochaska et al 2017;Muzahid et al 2018). The cooling rate of the gas is calculated assuming optically-thin photoionization equilibrium with a Haardt & Madau (2001) ionizing background.…”
Section: Simulations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%