1993
DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(93)90290-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COS and H2S fluxes over a wet meadow in relation to photosynthetic activity: An analysis of measurements made on 6 September 1990

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Bartell et al (1993) observed the emission of H 2 S only account for 1-2% of the sulfur deposited as COS to the soil/plant system and no H 2 S were detected in our above experiments, which were probably due to its high reactive activity on the surface of the soil. To further investigate the formation of H 2 S from the conversion of COS in the lawn soil, in situ DRIFTS experiment with higher concentration COS was performed.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Bartell et al (1993) observed the emission of H 2 S only account for 1-2% of the sulfur deposited as COS to the soil/plant system and no H 2 S were detected in our above experiments, which were probably due to its high reactive activity on the surface of the soil. To further investigate the formation of H 2 S from the conversion of COS in the lawn soil, in situ DRIFTS experiment with higher concentration COS was performed.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, the emission of H 2 S only accounted for 1-2% of the sulfur deposited as COS to the soil/ plant system investigated by Bartell et al (1993). Bartell et al pointed out that further physiological study is required to resolve this problem (Bartell et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not generally supported by field studies. While some in-situ experiments clearly showed uptake of COS by plants or soil/plant systems (Mihalopoulos et al, 1989;Hofmann et al, 1992;Bartell et al, 1993;Dippel and Jaeschke, 1996;Kuhn et al, 1999), other measurements found either no evidence of deposition (Berresheim and Vulcan, 1992) or the existence of both deposition and emission Hofmann, 1993;Huber, 1994). This indicates that the role of vegetation under natural conditions is more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It varies from 90 to 515 ppt and is usually lower than the tropospheric level of COS (∼ 500 ppt), suggesting that vegetation tends to take up COS in most cases. The air-plant exchange flux of COS was often found to be correlated to the CO 2 assimilation rate, to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and to the H 2 O flux (Kesselmeier and Merk, 1993;Bartell et al, 1993;Hofmann, 1993;Huber, 1994), implying the importance of plant physiological processes in controlling the COS exchange rate. The close relationship between COS uptake and CO 2 fixation is an encouraging finding, as it allows an estimate of the global vegetation sink of COS on the basis of the observed uptake ratio COS/CO 2 and the terrestrial plant productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%