2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortisol receptor expression differs in the brains of rainbow trout selected for divergent cortisol responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results show that relative expression levels of a and b glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors were not different between coping styles or between tissues tested. This finding contradicts the results by Johansen et al (2011) who reported increased mineralocorticoid receptors' expression in low responding (LR), compared with high responding (HR) rainbow trout. However, the differences may be explained by the applied protocol: the study by Johansen et al (2011) analysed different parts of the brain, such as cerebellum, hypothalamus, optic tectum and telencephalon, while this study examined the entire brain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results show that relative expression levels of a and b glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors were not different between coping styles or between tissues tested. This finding contradicts the results by Johansen et al (2011) who reported increased mineralocorticoid receptors' expression in low responding (LR), compared with high responding (HR) rainbow trout. However, the differences may be explained by the applied protocol: the study by Johansen et al (2011) analysed different parts of the brain, such as cerebellum, hypothalamus, optic tectum and telencephalon, while this study examined the entire brain.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This finding contradicts the results by Johansen et al (2011) who reported increased mineralocorticoid receptors' expression in low responding (LR), compared with high responding (HR) rainbow trout. However, the differences may be explained by the applied protocol: the study by Johansen et al (2011) analysed different parts of the brain, such as cerebellum, hypothalamus, optic tectum and telencephalon, while this study examined the entire brain. Additionally, Øverli et al (2007) suggest that HR and LR fish do not always correlate with behaviourally determined reactive and proactive fish, respectively, possibly due to other factors currently not fully understood.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Predation threat necessarily invokes a stress response and thus may evoke a reduction in feed intake both through physiological (Scheuerlein et al, 2001) and behavioural (Metcalfe, 1987) changes to reduce feeding rates in the presence of a predator. Coping style theory predicts that bold (proactive) and shy (reactive) animals respond to stress with low or high HPI activity, respectively (Koolhaas et al, 1999;Øverli et al, 2002;Pottinger and Carrick, 2001), and previous studies using lines of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, bred for divergent stress responses revealed significantly different patterns of gene expression between low and high stress responsive fish (Backström et al, 2011;Johansen et al, 2011;Thomson et al, 2011). However, how individual differences in HPI activity and coping style reflect antipredator and foraging strategies remains relatively under-studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mRNA levels of MR in the brain of juvenile rainbow trout are higher than in any other tissues measured using RT-PCR (Sturm et al, 2005). Recent work by Johansen et al (Johansen et al, 2011) showed that MR mRNA levels are elevated in the hypothalamus of rainbow trout that have been selectively bred for low cortisol response to stress compared with trout that were bred for high cortisol release. These low-response fish tend to become dominant when paired in agonistic interactions with high-response fish (Johansen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These low-response fish tend to become dominant when paired in agonistic interactions with high-response fish (Johansen et al, 2011). Thus, MR may play a conserved role in regulating dominance or cortisol levels in A. burtoni and rainbow trout.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%