2012
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3191-11.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticomuscular Coherence Is Tuned to the Spontaneous Rhythmicity of Speech at 2–3 Hz

Abstract: Human speech features rhythmicity that frames distinctive, fine-grained speech patterns. Speech can thus be counted among rhythmic motor behaviors that generally manifest characteristic spontaneous rates. However, the critical neural evidence for tuning of articulatory control to a spontaneous rate of speech has not been uncovered. The present study examined the spontaneous rhythmicity in speech production and its relationship to cortex-muscle neurocommunication, which is essential for speech control. Our MEG … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While natural human speech is not strictly rhythmic, continuous natural speech is characterized by quasi-periodic modulation in sound amplitude and orofacial movements in the 3-to 8-Hz range, a modulation most easily detected in the coherence between speech amplitude and neural measures of speech control (Alexandrou et al, 2016;Ruspantini et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While natural human speech is not strictly rhythmic, continuous natural speech is characterized by quasi-periodic modulation in sound amplitude and orofacial movements in the 3-to 8-Hz range, a modulation most easily detected in the coherence between speech amplitude and neural measures of speech control (Alexandrou et al, 2016;Ruspantini et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, as the muscle spindles of the tongue are highly developed in humans compared with those in other primates, proprioception from the tongue muscle spindles in humans may play an important role in speech production. Ruspantini et al (2012) reported that the low oscillatory frequency related to proprioceptive afferent feedback from the mouth muscles might play an important role in the smooth and sophisticated oral movements generated during word production. Moreover, the low-CMC related to proprioception may play critical role for keeping tongue position.…”
Section: Generator Mechanism Of the Low-cmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously explained, we disregard much of this variability; yet, not all results are readily usable in the context of the current discussion. We exclude the results from Gehrig et al (2012), Resnik et al (2014), and Ruspantini et al (2012), as their window(s) of analysis were ≥1 s (see their methods) and Salmelin et al (1994) because the results from their early methods of source localisation are not easily placed in our "cartoon" of cortical areas (see Figure 1). These exclusions leave 142 activities in 14 papers as being eligible for inclusion in our meta-analysis.…”
Section: Original Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest group of studies (but not a majority) focuses on motor functions (e.g. Ruspantini et al, 2012;Salmelin et al, 2000). Despite this diversity, the processes identified by the authors can be grouped into broad categories corresponding to canonical stages in language processing.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Function -The Original Authors' Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%