2009
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00443.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticomotor plasticity and learning of a ballistic thumb training task are diminished in older adults

Abstract: This study examined changes in corticomotor excitability and plasticity after a thumb abduction training task in young and old adults. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were obtained from right abductor pollicis brevis (APB, target muscle) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM, control muscle) in 14 young (18-24 yr) and 14 old (61-82 yr) adults. The training task consisted of 300 ballistic abductions of the right thumb to maximize peak thumb abduction acceleration (TAAcc). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
158
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
19
158
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the current study, SICI in resting muscle was not different between young and old adults, suggesting that resting post-synaptic GABAA mediated inhibitory tone in motor cortex is maintained with age [7]. This supports previous investigations from within our lab [20,[34][35][36], and from elsewhere [37][38][39], but is in contrast to reports of reduced [23,40,41] or increased [19,42] SICI with age. The reasons for these inconsistencies are currently unclear, but likely relate to variations in subject characteristics and methodological approach [20].…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Short-interval Intracortical Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Within the current study, SICI in resting muscle was not different between young and old adults, suggesting that resting post-synaptic GABAA mediated inhibitory tone in motor cortex is maintained with age [7]. This supports previous investigations from within our lab [20,[34][35][36], and from elsewhere [37][38][39], but is in contrast to reports of reduced [23,40,41] or increased [19,42] SICI with age. The reasons for these inconsistencies are currently unclear, but likely relate to variations in subject characteristics and methodological approach [20].…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Short-interval Intracortical Inhibitionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Inconsistent treatment outcomes appear to be influenced by variability in individuals' responses to NIBS. Several factors have been shown to influence the reliability and effectiveness of NIBS (Ridding and Ziemann, 2010), including genetic factors (Cheeran et al, 2008, Antal et al, 2010, hormone and drug interactions (Sale et al, 2008), age (Rogasch et al, 2009;Todd et al, 2010;Bashir et al, 2014) and levels of physical activity ). Other important factors that appear critical in determining the brain's response to NIBS, and which will be discussed in detail in this review, are the site of stimulation (Fox et al, 2014) and the activity of the underlying networks during stimulation (Nitsche et al, 2003;Fregni et al, 2005;Hummel et al, 2005;Antal et al, 2007;Kujirai et al, 2006;Andrews et al, 2011).…”
Section: Brain Stimulation As a Clinical Intervention For Restoring Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasticity induced with NIBS is likely to be reduced in the aged human brain (Rogasch et al, 2009;Todd et al, 2010;Bashir et al, 2014). Further, there is decreased segregation of A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Sale et al,32 neural networks as a function of increasing age (Chan et al, 2014).…”
Section: Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature suggests contradictory effects of age on SICI and LICI during both relaxation [27,29,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and isometric muscle activation [30,33,63], with variations in methodology and subject characteristics likely contributing to this heterogeneity. Despite this, as the conditioning stimulus intensity was adjusted to produce 50% inhibition of the test MEP during postural contractions, our findings could not have been confounded by any age-related differences in inhibition at baseline.…”
Section: Age-related Differences In Gabaergic Inhibition During Movemmentioning
confidence: 99%