2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07870.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corticomotor excitability and plasticity following complex visuomotor training in young and old adults

Abstract: Previous studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have shown that advancing age may influence plasticity induction in human motor cortex (M1), but these changes have been assessed with TMS-induced paradigms or simple motor tasks. The aim of this study was to examine changes in corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition as markers of corticomotor plasticity following complex motor training in young and old adults. Electromyographic recordings were obtained from the right first dorsal in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
100
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(187 reference statements)
16
100
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the current study, SICI in resting muscle was not different between young and old adults, suggesting that resting post-synaptic GABAA mediated inhibitory tone in motor cortex is maintained with age [7]. This supports previous investigations from within our lab [20,[34][35][36], and from elsewhere [37][38][39], but is in contrast to reports of reduced [23,40,41] or increased [19,42] SICI with age. The reasons for these inconsistencies are currently unclear, but likely relate to variations in subject characteristics and methodological approach [20].…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Short-interval Intracortical Inhibitioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Within the current study, SICI in resting muscle was not different between young and old adults, suggesting that resting post-synaptic GABAA mediated inhibitory tone in motor cortex is maintained with age [7]. This supports previous investigations from within our lab [20,[34][35][36], and from elsewhere [37][38][39], but is in contrast to reports of reduced [23,40,41] or increased [19,42] SICI with age. The reasons for these inconsistencies are currently unclear, but likely relate to variations in subject characteristics and methodological approach [20].…”
Section: Effects Of Age On Short-interval Intracortical Inhibitioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, recent research suggests that the magnitude of intracortical inhibition in young subjects also depends on the proportion of the test alone MEP relative to the maximum muscle response (Mmax; 18,25). These findings suggest that comparisons of intracortical inhibition between young and older subjects, which typically exhibit different Mmax characteristics (20), may confound the estimate of SICI and LICI between subject groups. Furthermore, it is not clear whether changes in test TMS intensity or test MEP amplitude (absolute or normalised) have similar effects on the magnitude of SICI and LICI in young and older adults.…”
Section: Long-interval Intracortical Inhibition (Lici; 8) Several Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature suggests contradictory effects of age on SICI and LICI during both relaxation [27,29,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and isometric muscle activation [30,33,63], with variations in methodology and subject characteristics likely contributing to this heterogeneity. Despite this, as the conditioning stimulus intensity was adjusted to produce 50% inhibition of the test MEP during postural contractions, our findings could not have been confounded by any age-related differences in inhibition at baseline.…”
Section: Age-related Differences In Gabaergic Inhibition During Movemmentioning
confidence: 99%