“…We found only 2 articles11, 12 that focused specifically on dystonia in CBD. Of the 404 selected cases, there were not sufficient data to conclude if there was dystonia in 108 (26.7%)14–30; of the remaining 296 cases, 111 (37.5%) were classified as CBD with dystonia,1, 2, 5, 10, 11, 31–67 and 185 (62.5%) were classified as CBD without dystonia1, 5, 10, 15, 18, 27, 28, 35, 36, 39, 40, 45, 47–50, 52, 55, 57, 57–59, 61, 62, 64, 66–80 (see Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, respectively, for all references). There was no significant difference between CBD with and without dystonia in age at onset (61.9 ± 16.5 vs 64.1 ± 6.7 years, respectively; P = .22), and disease duration (6.4 ± 2.7 vs 5.5 ± 2.6 years, respectively; P = .11).…”