2019
DOI: 10.1101/789495
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortico-striatal activity driving compulsive reward seeking

Abstract: Loss of control over drug intake and persistent drug-seeking despite negative consequences define addiction. Increase dopamine levels in the mesolimbic system may constitute the initial trigger. Optogenetic self-stimulation of VTA DA neurons (oDASS) has thus been proposed as an addiction model. Indeed, lever pressing to turn on a laser aimed at ChR2 expressing DA neurons is strongly reinforcing. Clinical observations indicate that drug-seeking even with the risk of harmful consequences occurs only in a fractio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During learning, Ca 2+ transients in striosomal populations that we recorded decreased in frequency and showed a trend toward increasing amplitude. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that, as learning occurs, striosome-based circuitry undergoes refinement via plasticity mechanisms (Harada et al, 2019;Owen et al, 2018;Xiong et al, 2015;Znamenskiy and Zador, 2013). Given the slow time course of GCaMP6m signaling, the frequency and amplitude of Ca 2+ transients might reflect development of more synchronized or patterned spike activity, as indicated by an increased SNR.…”
Section: Difference Between Striosomes and Matrix In Experience-dependent Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…During learning, Ca 2+ transients in striosomal populations that we recorded decreased in frequency and showed a trend toward increasing amplitude. This pattern is consistent with the possibility that, as learning occurs, striosome-based circuitry undergoes refinement via plasticity mechanisms (Harada et al, 2019;Owen et al, 2018;Xiong et al, 2015;Znamenskiy and Zador, 2013). Given the slow time course of GCaMP6m signaling, the frequency and amplitude of Ca 2+ transients might reflect development of more synchronized or patterned spike activity, as indicated by an increased SNR.…”
Section: Difference Between Striosomes and Matrix In Experience-dependent Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…1B). The shock intensity was chosen based on previous studies of punishment-resistant reward-seeking (Harada et al, 2019). We verified that this shock intensity is aversive to the mice in a fear conditioning paradigm in which 12 tone-shock pairings were delivered.…”
Section: A Random Interval But Not Random Ratio Schedule Of Reinforcement Promotes Punishment-resistant Reward-seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced activity and plasticity in orbitofrontal cortex to DMS projections have been observed in animals that compulsively self-stimulate their ventral tegmental area (VTA) dopamine neurons and in animals that compulsively self-administer methamphetamine. [12][13][14][15] To distinguish between these hypotheses, we trained mice to work for sucrose on a random interval schedule (RI60) known to promote habit and tested whether they became punishment resistant. We used fiber photometry to record dopamine axon activity in DMS and DLS during this behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%