2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical vessel sign on susceptibility weighted imaging reveals clinically relevant hypoperfusion in internal carotid artery stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypoperfusion finding is not surprising since this is a well observed finding in patients with long standing artery stenosis [25]. So When we investigated the presence of a relative cerebellar and brainstem hypoperfusion in the non-VAD and BAC cohort with UIV patients, the exclusion and inclusion of VAS, VA occlusion (VAO), BA stenosis (BAS) would be discussed respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoperfusion finding is not surprising since this is a well observed finding in patients with long standing artery stenosis [25]. So When we investigated the presence of a relative cerebellar and brainstem hypoperfusion in the non-VAD and BAC cohort with UIV patients, the exclusion and inclusion of VAS, VA occlusion (VAO), BA stenosis (BAS) would be discussed respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons for that. First, in a previous report prominent and partially enlarged cortical veins were found in areas of hypoperfusion. This sign can be detected on SWI for increased deoxyhemoglobin in these vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following inclusion criteria were used: 1) patients with acute or subacute cerebral infarction caused by occlusion of ipsilateral MCA; 2) MR inspection sequences included DWI, SWI, and time‐of‐flight MR angiography (TOF‐MRA); 3) a 3‐month clinical follow‐up, evaluated with a modified Rankin Scale scoring (mRS) ; 4) if there was a history of previous ischemic attacks, no sequelae left over, or mRS <3 and the fluctuation of mRS ≤1; 5) no contraindication for MR examination. The exclusion criterion were: 1) patients with bilateral acute or subacute infarction foci; 2) severe steno‐occlusion of vessels of posterior circulation or other cerebral arteries of anterior circulation; 3) patients with hemorrhagic transformation; 4) patients without SWI‐DWI mismatch area; 5) patients without sufficient MR and clinical data; or 6) onset to admission time >2 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In addition, hypoperfusion caused by carotid stenosis can increase stroke risk and can be assessed by Doppler sonography, computed tomography (CT) or MR-perfusion and positron-emission tomography (PET). [22][23][24] Burning questions, without recent evidence from randomised trials, are: whether CAS or CEA are still superior to a modern optimal medical therapy (OMT) in the primary prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with a severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis; and whether CAS is at least non-inferior to CEA in terms of safety and efficacy. To gain data on this topic the investigator-initiated multicentre controlled design (updated protocol).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In addition, hypoperfusion caused by carotid stenosis can increase stroke risk and can be assessed by Doppler sonography, computed tomography (CT) or MR-perfusion and positron-emission tomography (PET). [22][23][24] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%