2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Thickness in Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Attention Deficit Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
33
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In rats, ethanol applied throughout gestation caused slightly thinner cortex at P11, but cortical thickness was nearly normal by P60, even though reduced volume and surface area persisted (Leigland et al, 2013). In adolescent and adult FASD subjects, cerebral cortex was found to be thicker than controls, perhaps reflecting compensatory development after ethanol-induced damage (Fernández-Jaén et al, 2011; Sowell et al, 2008; Yang et al, 2012). However, there is also a finding of thinner cortex in FASD subjects (Zhou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In rats, ethanol applied throughout gestation caused slightly thinner cortex at P11, but cortical thickness was nearly normal by P60, even though reduced volume and surface area persisted (Leigland et al, 2013). In adolescent and adult FASD subjects, cerebral cortex was found to be thicker than controls, perhaps reflecting compensatory development after ethanol-induced damage (Fernández-Jaén et al, 2011; Sowell et al, 2008; Yang et al, 2012). However, there is also a finding of thinner cortex in FASD subjects (Zhou et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similar slopes of volume change with age in the FASD and control group here confirm longitudinal findings (Gautam et al, 2015a, Treit et al, 2013), except for white matter and amygdala which are shown to have larger group differences at older ages here. Previous cortical thickness studies of FASD have yielded inconsistent group differences, with some studies finding reductions (Gautam et al, 2015b, Robertson et al, 2016, Zhou et al, 2011), increases (Fernandez-Jaen et al, 2011, Sowell et al, 2008, Yang et al, 2012) or no difference in cortical thickness in the FASD group relative to controls (Rajaprakash et al, 2014, Wozniak et al, 2013). Inconsistencies in previous literature may potentially stem from differences in methodology, patient populations and developmental effects of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A detailed description of the sequential, semi-automated approach used in the present study to measure cortical thickness can be found elsewhere (Fernández-Jaén et al, 2011. Briefly, it entails three successive steps: 1) automated removal of nonbrain tissue using FSL´s brain extraction tool (BET; version 2.1).…”
Section: Image Preprocessing and Cortical Thickness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%