2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical reorganization during PASAT task in MS patients with preserved working memory functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
80
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
15
80
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3 A major finding of these studies is that, at least in early phases of MS when cognitive impairment is not yet detectable, patients activate additional brain areas to compensate for potential functional deficits. 2,6,7 This observation has been supported and expanded on by studies describing enhanced connectivity as a neuroplasticity mechanism that probably compensates for cognitive deficits at early stages of the disease. 3,5,8,9 Despite this possible convergence among different studies, interpreting brain activity patterns during cognitive task performance can present difficulties, particularly when trying to identify compensatory adaptations in neurological populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 A major finding of these studies is that, at least in early phases of MS when cognitive impairment is not yet detectable, patients activate additional brain areas to compensate for potential functional deficits. 2,6,7 This observation has been supported and expanded on by studies describing enhanced connectivity as a neuroplasticity mechanism that probably compensates for cognitive deficits at early stages of the disease. 3,5,8,9 Despite this possible convergence among different studies, interpreting brain activity patterns during cognitive task performance can present difficulties, particularly when trying to identify compensatory adaptations in neurological populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…3,5,8,9 Despite this possible convergence among different studies, interpreting brain activity patterns during cognitive task performance can present difficulties, particularly when trying to identify compensatory adaptations in neurological populations. First, to conclude that there is functional reorganisation secondary to a possible deficit, [5][6][7] patients must execute the task with similar accuracy as the control group. Second, differences in brain activation patterns may arise from using different strategies to solve a task, especially if tasks involve complex cognitive operations, thus complicating interpretation of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main findings of these studies was the induction of a change in brain activation, in frontal and temporal regions, as well as in cerebellum, through cognitive rehabilitation. This increase in brain activation was thought to help compensate for the cognitive deficits seen in these patients 27,28 since failure of such mechanisms as a result of disease damage progressively leads to cognitive deterioration. 29 cortex, prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex), which showed an increase (or stability) of activity over time in the treatment group but a decrease in the control group.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, by selecting individuals diagnosed with MS who did not exhibit obvious cognitive deficits (Forn et al, 2006(Forn et al, , 2007, investigators have attempted to control the performance-activation confounds endemic to clinical imaging studies (see Price & Friston, 1999;Price & Friston, 2002). The investigators interpreted increased PFC activation during WM performance in this MS sample as "reflective of the existence of neural reorganizative processes" (Forn et al, 2007).…”
Section: Current Findings In Clinical Imaging Of Wmmentioning
confidence: 99%