2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06437-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical quantitative MRI parameters are related to the cognitive status in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean cortical T 2 values were determined across all non‐zero vertices for each subject, as discussed in a previous study, 30 and compared between groups with an unpaired t ‐test. The Pearson correlation coefficients between these values and clinical parameters (number of seizures in the previous 3 months and number of anticonvulsive drugs in the medical history, including current treatment) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean cortical T 2 values were determined across all non‐zero vertices for each subject, as discussed in a previous study, 30 and compared between groups with an unpaired t ‐test. The Pearson correlation coefficients between these values and clinical parameters (number of seizures in the previous 3 months and number of anticonvulsive drugs in the medical history, including current treatment) were calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, some earlier studies reported increased T1 values in the cortex ( 12 , 13 , 38 ). While others did not find significant differences in T1-RT in the cortex and thalami between patients with MS and healthy controls ( 14 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…More importantly, the basic data of patients' cognitive function should be kept to determine whether it has changed in the future. Early assessment is important because MCI is not a normal aging process and has a high risk of progression to dementia (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%