2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical processing of musical sounds in children with Cochlear Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
53
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
11
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further study would also need to investigate effects of training at the neural level. Using a deviant detection task (tone, duration, intensity, and timbre) in pediatric cochlear implant users that were not musically trained, Torppa et al (2012) observed smaller amplitudes for the P1, MMN, and P3a components as well as longer latency of the MMN than in matched normal hearing children. Further studies will investigate if music training could improve these neural indices in deaf children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further study would also need to investigate effects of training at the neural level. Using a deviant detection task (tone, duration, intensity, and timbre) in pediatric cochlear implant users that were not musically trained, Torppa et al (2012) observed smaller amplitudes for the P1, MMN, and P3a components as well as longer latency of the MMN than in matched normal hearing children. Further studies will investigate if music training could improve these neural indices in deaf children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were 21 unilaterally implanted and 21 normal-hearing (NH) children, aged 4 -13 years, and native speakers of Finnish (all participated also in the study by Torppa et al, 2012 . None had any diagnosed developmental or linguistic problems and normal-hearing status had been confi rmed in child welfare clinics.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, to record brain responses to out-of-key and out-of-scale stimuli subjects an EEG session of almost 1 h was required (Brattico et al, 2006). Most recently, MMN has been studied using a so-called multi-feature paradigm in which deviant sounds with different acoustic deviances alternate with standard sounds, allowing recordings of several MMNs as fast as in 15 min (Näätänen et al, 2004; Pakarinen et al, 2007; Partanen et al, 2011; Vuust et al, 2011; Torppa et al, 2012). In that paradigm, each standard sound is followed by a different deviant, sound sequence being, for instance, Standard Deviant-Frequency Standard Deviant-Intensity Standard Deviant-Duration etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that paradigm, each standard sound is followed by a different deviant, sound sequence being, for instance, Standard Deviant-Frequency Standard Deviant-Intensity Standard Deviant-Duration etc. These sound sequences can consist of sinusoidal sound complexes (Näätänen et al, 2004; Pakarinen et al, 2007), phonemes (Partanen et al, 2011), or alternating piano tones (Vuust et al, 2011; Torppa et al, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%