2004
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Measures of Anticipation

Abstract: Anticipation increases the efficiency of cognitive processes by partial advance activation of the neural substrate involved in those processes. In the case of perceptual anticipation, a slow cortical potential named Stimulus-Preceding Negativity (SPN) has been identified. The SPN has been observed preceding four types of stimuli: (1) stimuli providing knowledge-of-results (KR) about past performance, (2) stimuli conveying an instruction about a future task, (3) probe stimuli against which the outcome of a prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
144
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
14
144
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the previous studies that have shown effects of temporally selective attention on early perceptual processing have asked participants to attend to times that straddle anterior and central electrodes, it is tempting to conclude that it was largely driven by the timing estimates that participants needed to make (Macar & Vidal, 2004). However, the stimulus preceding negativity has been shown to originate from regions involved in processing the expected stimulus (Van Boxtel & Böcker, 2004). Therefore, it would be expected to have a more posterior distribution for visual stimuli but to be larger at the anterior and central electrodes, where auditory onset components were most evident in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, the previous studies that have shown effects of temporally selective attention on early perceptual processing have asked participants to attend to times that straddle anterior and central electrodes, it is tempting to conclude that it was largely driven by the timing estimates that participants needed to make (Macar & Vidal, 2004). However, the stimulus preceding negativity has been shown to originate from regions involved in processing the expected stimulus (Van Boxtel & Böcker, 2004). Therefore, it would be expected to have a more posterior distribution for visual stimuli but to be larger at the anterior and central electrodes, where auditory onset components were most evident in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Of interest, Vandamme et al (2010) discovered opposite ERP modulations-that is, an increased contingent negativity variation (CNV)-like deflection over the anterior-posterior scalp for expecting a "voluntary" switch prior to target presentation-as compared to ITS. According to the literature (Van Boxtel & Böcker, 2004), CNV has been widely connected to reflect response preparation and stimulus anticipation prior to the target presentation, which is in line with the definition of intentional control. Thus, Vandamme et al (2010) claimed this increased CNV-like activity to be an index of intentional preparation for voluntary switching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Electrophysiological methods are also more child-and patient-friendly than most other brain imaging methodologies. In the current study we exploit the superior temporal resolution and direct association between underlying neural activity and scalp recorded EEG, and use a variant of the MID task (Electrophysiological or e-MID) to investigate event-related brain potentials (ERP) to reinforcement cues, reinforcement-contingent target processing and reinforcement-related feedback with Boxtel & Bocker, 2004). There is evidence to suggest the CNV is modulated by motivation (Cant & Bickford, 1967;Irwin, et al, 1966), effort (Falkenstein et al, 2003Gómez et al, 2007) and the anticipation of affective or motivationally salient stimuli (Baas, et al, 2002;Klorman & Ryan, 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%