2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.08.194555
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Localization of the Sensory-Motor Transformation in a Whisker Detection Task in Mice

Abstract: AbstractResponding to a stimulus requires transforming an internal sensory representation into an internal motor representation. Where and how this sensory-motor transformation occurs is a matter of vigorous debate. Here, we trained mice in a whisker detection go/no-go task in which they learned to respond (lick) following a transient whisker deflection. Using single unit recordings, we quantified sensory-, motor- and choice-related activities in whisker primary somatosensory c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, differences in selectivity (between target-aligned S1 and distractor-aligned S1, between control trials and wMC suppression trials) are observable by 30 ms post-stimulus onset. This is well before the response time (>200 ms), before the onset of uninstructed whisker movements that are part of the ‘Go’ motor sequence (>80 ms, Aruljothi et al, 2020, and data not shown), and well before the emergence of significant choice probability in S1, which includes the contributions of ‘Go’ movements (>165 ms, Zareian et al, 2021). Second, increases in distractor responses in target-aligned S1 are present irrespective of trial outcome (false alarm or correct rejection), and are not present on catch trials (i.e., in the absence of distractor stimuli) (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, differences in selectivity (between target-aligned S1 and distractor-aligned S1, between control trials and wMC suppression trials) are observable by 30 ms post-stimulus onset. This is well before the response time (>200 ms), before the onset of uninstructed whisker movements that are part of the ‘Go’ motor sequence (>80 ms, Aruljothi et al, 2020, and data not shown), and well before the emergence of significant choice probability in S1, which includes the contributions of ‘Go’ movements (>165 ms, Zareian et al, 2021). Second, increases in distractor responses in target-aligned S1 are present irrespective of trial outcome (false alarm or correct rejection), and are not present on catch trials (i.e., in the absence of distractor stimuli) (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Between recordings, the skull was protected with Kwik-Cast (World Precision Instruments). For further surgergical details, see Aruljothi et al, 2020 and Zareian et al, 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different types of behaviors and contexts (e.g. goal-directed behaviors with sensory feedback) may involve driving inputs from other populations or regions, such as supragranular layers or somatosensory cortex ( Hooks et al, 2013; Dacre et al, 2021; Zareian et al, 2021; Yamawaki et al, 2021 ). We note that in our model and in vivo experiments ( Schiemann et al, 2015 ) the quiet state does not correspond to a preparatory state, as it lacks short-term memory, delays and other preparatory components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%