1996
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199609000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Localization of Human Sustained Attention: Detection with Functional MR Using a Visual Vigilance Paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
63
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects are generally observed for both the accuracy of target detection (Rueckert & Grafman, 1996;Wilkins et al, 1987) and for RTs (Rueckert & Grafman, 1996). Functional brain imaging studies in healthy participants have further suggested that overall vigilance may involve a subcortico-cortical system relying on the right prefrontal cortex (Cohen, Semple, Gross, Holcomb, Dowling, & Nordahl, 1988;Cohen, Semple, Gross, King, & Nordahl, 1992;Coull, Frith, Frackowiak, & Grasby, 1996;Deutsch, Papanicolaou, Bourbon, & Eisenberg, 1987;Fassbender et al, 2004;Lewin et al, 1996;Pardo, Fox, & Raichle, 1991), the parietal lobes (Coull et al, 1996;Fassbender et al, 2004;Pardo et al, 1991), the anterior cingulate, the thalamus, and brainstem structures (Coull, Frackowiak, & Frith, 1998;Kinomura, Larsson, Gulyas, & Roland, 1996;Paus et al 1997;Sturm et al, 1999). There is some evidence from functional brain imaging studies suggesting that the brain regions involved in overall vigilance may also be involved in the vigilance decrement, as activation in these same regions has been shown to decrease over time on task (Coull & al., 1998;Paus et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects are generally observed for both the accuracy of target detection (Rueckert & Grafman, 1996;Wilkins et al, 1987) and for RTs (Rueckert & Grafman, 1996). Functional brain imaging studies in healthy participants have further suggested that overall vigilance may involve a subcortico-cortical system relying on the right prefrontal cortex (Cohen, Semple, Gross, Holcomb, Dowling, & Nordahl, 1988;Cohen, Semple, Gross, King, & Nordahl, 1992;Coull, Frith, Frackowiak, & Grasby, 1996;Deutsch, Papanicolaou, Bourbon, & Eisenberg, 1987;Fassbender et al, 2004;Lewin et al, 1996;Pardo, Fox, & Raichle, 1991), the parietal lobes (Coull et al, 1996;Fassbender et al, 2004;Pardo et al, 1991), the anterior cingulate, the thalamus, and brainstem structures (Coull, Frackowiak, & Frith, 1998;Kinomura, Larsson, Gulyas, & Roland, 1996;Paus et al 1997;Sturm et al, 1999). There is some evidence from functional brain imaging studies suggesting that the brain regions involved in overall vigilance may also be involved in the vigilance decrement, as activation in these same regions has been shown to decrease over time on task (Coull & al., 1998;Paus et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prefrontal cortex is involved in maintaining, monitoring, and manipulating information in working memory, 10 and particularly in sustained attention. 11,12 The anterior cingulate gyrus has been implicated in divided attention, novelty detection, working memory, memory retrieval, Stroop tasks (inhibition), evaluative judgment, motivation, and performance monitoring. [11][12][13][14][15][16] The anterior cingulate gyrus is considered an initiating or inhibiting region, in that it initiates appropriate, and suppresses inappropriate, behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory attention is known to cause increased activity not only over the auditory cortex, 44,45 but also over a broad range of other cortical areas, including frontal, prefrontal, parietal and supplementary motor areas. 46,47 In view of the enhancing effect of active-response listening, future NIRS research might address possible effects of attention on auditory streaming with more specific listening instructions. It is assumed that the frequency separation between the tones in auditory streaming stimuli may not be the only catalyst of different rhythm percepts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%