1964
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.2.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical Intracellular Potentials During Augmenting and Recruiting Responses: Ii. Patterns of Synaptic Activities in Pyramidal and Nonpyramidal Tract Neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the voltage dependence of the isolated late EPSP1 was similar to that of the isolated late EPSP2 ( Fig. 9Ba; al. 1964;Douglas & Martin, 1991;Ferster & Jagadeesh, 1992;Metherate & Ashe, 1993a, b;Nunez et al 1993) and in vitro (Connors et al 1982;Jones & Baughman, 1988;Sutor & Hablitz, 1989a;Higashi et al 1991;Cox et al 1992).…”
Section: Pharmacological Agentssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Note that the voltage dependence of the isolated late EPSP1 was similar to that of the isolated late EPSP2 ( Fig. 9Ba; al. 1964;Douglas & Martin, 1991;Ferster & Jagadeesh, 1992;Metherate & Ashe, 1993a, b;Nunez et al 1993) and in vitro (Connors et al 1982;Jones & Baughman, 1988;Sutor & Hablitz, 1989a;Higashi et al 1991;Cox et al 1992).…”
Section: Pharmacological Agentssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Morison and Dempsey originally proposed a thalamic system in parallel to that underlying the primary response but which receives substantial indirect excitation from cortical efferents as well as from lemniscal afferents. The state of increased excitation of the augmented response was suggested to involve 'mutual reinforcement' between thalamus and cortex, but the 'principal mechanism underlying augmentation ... lies in the thalamus' Grossman, Clark & Whiteside, 1967;Sasaki et al 1970;Matsuda et al 1972), others still have sought to explain the phenomenon in terms of a cortical mechanism (Purpura, Shofer & Musgrave, 1964;Morin & Steriade, 1981). While the pathway from the site of stimulation is said to be the same as that underlying the primary response, the intracortical effects of the input change dramatically with stimulus frequency.…”
Section: Source Of Incremental Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon repetitive stimulation of specific or nonspecific thalamic nuclei, an augmenting or recruiting response, respectively, could be recorded from the cortical surface (10,11). Intracellular recordings re-608 B. SUTOR AND J. J. HABLITZ vealed significant changes in the EPSP amplitude and duration (20,22,35,36). The augmenting response, evoked by repetitive stimulation of the nucleus ventralis lateralis, was associated with the appearance of a delayed second EPSP (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%