2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical functional connectivity is associated with the valence of affective states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth reflection that in practice results of DTF analysis correspond very well with known neuroimaging, intracranial and electrophysiological evidence including topographic accuracy (Ginter et al, 2001; Kuś et al, 2006; Blinowska et al, 2010, 2013; Brzezicka et al, 2010; Wyczesany et al, 2014, 2015; Ligeza et al, 2016). As an example may serve the finger movement task.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is worth reflection that in practice results of DTF analysis correspond very well with known neuroimaging, intracranial and electrophysiological evidence including topographic accuracy (Ginter et al, 2001; Kuś et al, 2006; Blinowska et al, 2010, 2013; Brzezicka et al, 2010; Wyczesany et al, 2014, 2015; Ligeza et al, 2016). As an example may serve the finger movement task.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Based on EEG montage brain atlases (Kaiser 2007; Okamoto et al 2004), electrodes corresponding to our regions of interest were selected as follows: left DLPFC (LDLPFC: F3); right DLPFC (RDLPFC: F4), ACC (Fz); left temporal area (LTmp: T7, TP7); and right temporal area (RTmp: T8, TP8). The DTF values were calculated for the whole beta band, as this frequency window covers an important part of middle- and long-range cortical communication (Kuś, Blinowska, Kamiński, & Basińska-Starzycka, 2008; Wyczesany et al, 2014a). Group and valence differences in effective connectivity were examined for the following ROIs in both directions separately: LDLPFC↔LTmp; RDLPFCR↔RTmp; LDLPFC↔RTmp; RDLPFC↔LTmp; LDLPFC↔ACC; RDLPFC↔ACC; (repeated-measures MANOVA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that many diverse strategies of emotional control exist, all of them seem to depend on a similar emotional control circuit, which comprises the regulatory loop between the prefrontal cortex, limbic cortex, and other limbic regions such as the amygdala and hippocampus (Ochsner, Bunge, Gross, & Gabrieli, 2002). Within this circuit, effective emotional control (down-regulation of negative emotional states) is manifested by higher activation of the prefrontal cortex and decreased activation of the limbic structures (Taylor & Liberzon, 2007), as well as increased connectivity of the prefrontal cortex, which possibly initiates the modulating actions (Wyczesany, Ferdek & Grzybowski, 2014; Wyczesany, Ligeza & Grzybowski, 2014). Supporting this assertion, it was found by Banks et al (2007) that the fronto-limbic coupling may be a predictor of the successful top-down cognitive modulation of the negative affect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is to perform causal connectivity analysis as described in Sect. 2.2 directly on the available sensor time series Y(t) (Kaminski and Blinowska 2014;Wyczesany et al 2014;. This implies considering the MVAR model ( ) = 2 5 6 ( ) ( − ) + 6 7 ( ) ,…”
Section: Assessment Of Causal Connectivity For Eeg Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%