1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00234776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical efferent flow influencing unit responses of medial geniculate body to sound stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These corticofugal projections are organized tonotopically, such that neurons of a given frequency preference in the cortex project to neurons of similar frequency preference in the MGB and IC (hereafter, subcortical neurons) 4,5 . The effects of cortical feedback on subcortical neurons have been variously described as inhibitory [6][7][8][9] , excitatory 10,11 or both [12][13][14] . We showed previously that in the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii, excitatory feedback serves to enhance the responses of subcortical neurons tuned to similar frequencies, whereas the inhibitory connections provide a more widespread inhibition of neurons tuned to other frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These corticofugal projections are organized tonotopically, such that neurons of a given frequency preference in the cortex project to neurons of similar frequency preference in the MGB and IC (hereafter, subcortical neurons) 4,5 . The effects of cortical feedback on subcortical neurons have been variously described as inhibitory [6][7][8][9] , excitatory 10,11 or both [12][13][14] . We showed previously that in the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii, excitatory feedback serves to enhance the responses of subcortical neurons tuned to similar frequencies, whereas the inhibitory connections provide a more widespread inhibition of neurons tuned to other frequencies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional studies have shown that neocortical electrical stimulation elicits excitatory, andlor inhibitory, andlor complex responses of different latencies from ipsilateral IC neurons (Massopust and Ordy, 1962;Watanabe et al, 1966;Amato et al, 1970;Mitani et al, 1983;Syka and Popelar, 1984;Syka et al, 1988;Sun et al, 19891, which are best explained by varied synaptic interactions occurring within the IC. If, as was discussed above, the corticocollicular projections participate in excitatory synaptic transmission, the inhibitory and complex responses would indicate that at least a percentage of the neurons postsynaptic to neocortical endings are inhibitory and probably y-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic.…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of 20 corticofugal modulatory neurons obtained by Watanabe et al (1966), six had facilitatory effects, with a maximum increase of 57% in the number of spikes. A similar phenomenon was also observed in the cat MGv, in which interneurons accounted for one-fourth of the total population (Villa et al, 1991;He, 1997).…”
Section: Facilitatory Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both processes have been observed in the MGB and in the inferior colliculus (IC) when the cortex was activated by electrical stimulation (Watanabe et al, 1966;Sun et al, 1989;He, 1997He, , 2003Suga et al, 1997;Zhou and Jen, 2000;He et al, 2002). The electrical activation of the auditory cortex mainly caused strong facilitation and little inhibition on the lemniscal nucleus of the MGB, although it mainly caused inhibition on the non-lemniscal MGB (Yan and Suga, 1996;He, 1997He, , 2003He et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%