2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cortical correlates of the basic and first harmonic frequency of Parkinsonian tremor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with previous findings on corticomuscular synchronization (for review, see Mima and Hallett (1999a); Salenius and Hari (2003)), the proposed statistical test improves the detection of the significant areas of correlation at 10 Hz and 20 Hz between EEG and EMG in the timefrequency plane. Significant corticomuscular interactions were found around 20 Hz in agreement with the literature (see Conway et al (1995); Kilner et al (2000); Salenius et al (1997)) but also around 10 Hz, a finding that is less common but nonetheless reported in several studies in healthy subjects (see Feige et al (2000); Marsden et al (2001)) and in Parkinson's patients (see (Raethjen et al (2009)). …”
Section: Discussion On the Analysis Of Corticomuscular Interactionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In agreement with previous findings on corticomuscular synchronization (for review, see Mima and Hallett (1999a); Salenius and Hari (2003)), the proposed statistical test improves the detection of the significant areas of correlation at 10 Hz and 20 Hz between EEG and EMG in the timefrequency plane. Significant corticomuscular interactions were found around 20 Hz in agreement with the literature (see Conway et al (1995); Kilner et al (2000); Salenius et al (1997)) but also around 10 Hz, a finding that is less common but nonetheless reported in several studies in healthy subjects (see Feige et al (2000); Marsden et al (2001)) and in Parkinson's patients (see (Raethjen et al (2009)). …”
Section: Discussion On the Analysis Of Corticomuscular Interactionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…On the contrary, the fact that there was no systematic bias in the error between the analytical and experimental results across all measurements is incompatible with a neural drive to the muscles reflecting a superimposition of the output of two oscillators. Although the results cannot rule out the presence of a second neural oscillator at twice the tremor frequency projecting to the motor neurons, as previously indicated by analysis of EEG-EMG coherence [17], the findings suggest that its relative contribution to the output of the motor neurons (neural drive to the muscle) would in any case be low ( figure 5). Alternatively, the relative timing between the two oscillations needs to be perfectly regular, which seems unlikely, given the experimental inter-burst interval variability (figure 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Therefore, spectral characteristics of tremulous movements presumably reflect specific neural mechanisms for muscle control, although the central neural networks from which tremor in ET and PD originates are currently not fully understood [15,16]. Recently, it has been suggested that two separate neural oscillators projecting to the muscle via different pathways are responsible for the spectral peaks at the base tremor frequency and at twice that frequency, respectively [17,18]. This may provide a possible explanation for the observed differences across ET and PD patients as it implies that the amplitude of spectral peaks at integer multiples of the tremor frequency reflects the relative strength of two central oscillatory networks rather than the harmonics of one input at the base frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation process was the same as in previous cortico-muscular coherence studies [2527]. Following segmentation of the data stream into 70 segments of 1-s duration, the segment was windowed with a 1-s Hamming window (90% overlap), and a Fourier transform was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%