2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3104508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption, Taxes and Compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tanzi and Davoodi (2000) point out that corruption hampers total tax revenues and that this effect differs according to the category of the tax considered in cross‐section analyses. Thornton (2008), Attila et al (2009), Imam and Jacobs (2014) and Baum et al (2017) also evidence similar findings that not only corruption has a negative effect on public revenues collection, but also modulates tax structure in favour of the tariffs whilst dipping direct and indirect revenues owing to rent‐seeking. Uslaner (2010) presents empirical findings that cover 27–28 transition economies from 2002 to 2005, which suggest that corruption negatively impacts tax payment decisions.…”
Section: Corruption Quality Of Public Policies and Fiscal Space In De...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Tanzi and Davoodi (2000) point out that corruption hampers total tax revenues and that this effect differs according to the category of the tax considered in cross‐section analyses. Thornton (2008), Attila et al (2009), Imam and Jacobs (2014) and Baum et al (2017) also evidence similar findings that not only corruption has a negative effect on public revenues collection, but also modulates tax structure in favour of the tariffs whilst dipping direct and indirect revenues owing to rent‐seeking. Uslaner (2010) presents empirical findings that cover 27–28 transition economies from 2002 to 2005, which suggest that corruption negatively impacts tax payment decisions.…”
Section: Corruption Quality Of Public Policies and Fiscal Space In De...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The level of corruption is included to control its potential effect on the quality of tax policy and administration as well as mobile money adoption. Indeed, corruption tends to penalise the quality of tax administration through its effect on tax compliance (Attila, Chambas and Combes 2009;Baum et al 2017). In addition, high corruption may dampen the population's trust in government and thus reduce the acceptance of or adoption of mobile money.…”
Section: Robustness Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It hinders economic growth and the competitiveness of international trade when the costs of conducting business activities increase due to inflated prices resulting from bribery. Corruption also reduces the government's ability to implement regulations and take action to correct market failures, while providing an opportunity to impede government intervention due to motivations arising from corrupt behavior [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence also demonstrates that corruption reduces tax revenue. In fact, some studies have revealed that more than 50 percent of tax revenue goes uncollected due to corruption, which can have a substantial negative impact on economic growth and result in decreased human development [6,[18][19][20][21]. On the other hand, corruption affects public debt by lowering bond ratings, which in turn leads to higher costs of debt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%