2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10610-016-9312-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corruption in Public Procurement: Finding the Right Indicators

Abstract: Red flags are widely used to minimize the risk of various forms of economic misconduct, among which corruption in public procurement. Drawing on criminal investigations, the literature has developed several indicators of corruption in public procurements and has put them forward as viable risk indicators. But are they genuinely viable, if only corrupt procurements are analysed? Using a dataset of 192 public procurementswith 96 cases where corruption was detected and 96 cases where corruption was not detectedth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the essential segments and research questions is certainly the input data. The studies are focused on the detection and analysis of high-quality corruption indicators, risk patterns, or red flags as representatives of corruptive or suspicious actions with the aim of developing models with the best predictive features [3,4,5,6,22,24,31,32]. Including different databases, pattern recognition, and elicitation knowledge is part of the Knowledge Discovery area.…”
Section: B Corruption Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the essential segments and research questions is certainly the input data. The studies are focused on the detection and analysis of high-quality corruption indicators, risk patterns, or red flags as representatives of corruptive or suspicious actions with the aim of developing models with the best predictive features [3,4,5,6,22,24,31,32]. Including different databases, pattern recognition, and elicitation knowledge is part of the Knowledge Discovery area.…”
Section: B Corruption Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many more indicators (Ferwerda et al, 2017;OECD, 2013; International Competition Network, 2010) of possible collusion, bid rigging (e.g. location distance of an offeror's enterprise vs location of offered services, simultaneous attendance in procedures of the same set of offerors, frequency of interaction through trade associations, staff moving between companies, market transparency, e.g.…”
Section: Other Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corruption in the public procurement is examined in more details in the studies by Fazekas and Toth [31] and Fervarda et al [32]. Both studies prove that accurate and profoundly structured data are necessary for a creation of the quality analytical framework.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%