Corruption in Indonesia (Is It Right to Governance, Leadership and It to Be Caused?)

Abstract

Purpose-The development of corruption in Indonesia which concerns various efforts and strategies are implemented but has not been able to maximize results. Poor governance, technology that is less able to use wisely and appropriately, and leadership that has not been able to set an example and figure are problems that need to be studied in depth as a cause of corruption that cannot be controlled. Pentagon Fraud is a theoretical approach chosen in solving research problems. Design / Methodology-quantitative approach with causality relationship with multiple regression analysis techniques used, because the type of research that uses samples obtained with primary data has a frequency that is quite safe and varied, which includes several ministries and institutions which according to media observations commit corruption in 2017-2018 involving state aparters in the institution. Findings-statistical data processing shows that governance and information technology has a positive effect on corruption, while leadership has a negative effect on corruption. The results showed the need for improvement in the management of government organizations, leadership more committed to duties and obligations, while the ease and use of information technology was carried out for positive purposes. Research limitations / implications-research is only conducted on some state institutions involved in corruption in the research year by using the perceptions of the state apparatus who have information about corruption, so the results obtained are not able to conclude as a whole. Further in-depth research is needed by involving respondents and broader government organizations and a diversity of variables, to be able to infer aspects of the causes of corruption in general. Besides, the research provides a good enough use-value for the government to make improvements, resolve corruption problems both prevention and eradication precisely and strategically. The theoretical aspects of research contribute to several findings that can develop aspects of the causes of motivation to commit corruption so that it becomes a study that increasingly criticizes the harmony and balance between theory and practice.

The Role of Transformational Leadership and Communication in Building Good Governance in Indonesia Film Censorship Institution

“…Regarding corruption cases, organizational management and leadership commitment to carrying out their duties and obligations by utilizing the convenience and use of information technology for positive purposes is significant (Prihanto & Gunawan, 2020).…”

Analisis Efektivitas Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintahan

“…Akuntansi pertanggungjawaban sebagai sistem pelaporan bukan hanya untuk menunjukkan terjadinya aktivitas namun juga memberikan data tentang penyimpangan anggaran yang mengindikasikan laporan kinerja kepemimpinan (Prihanto & Gunawan, 2020) dan sistem pengendalian internal yang baik mampu mendeteksi. Penelitian yang dilakukan (Mokoginta et al, 2017) menyatakan adanya hubungan negatif dan tidak signifikan antara sistem pengendalian internal terhadap kualitas pelaporan keuangan, sedangkan (Aditya & Surjono, 2017;Faishol, 2016) menyatakan hubungan yang positif antara kualitas sistem pelaporan keuangan terhadap sistem pengendalian internal.…”

“…Berdasarkan hasil statistik melalui uji regresi berganda yang telah dilakukan, variabel sistem pelaporan keuangan daerah berpengaruh signifikan terhadap sistem pengendalian internal dengan tingkat signifikansi < 0,01 namun demikian hasil tersebut tidak dapat mendukung hipotesis penelitian satu (H1) yang berarti hipotesis tersebut ditolak dengan hipotesis yang diajukan sebelumnya. Hasil penelitian didukung dengan penelitian sebelumnya yang menyatakan terjadinya ketidakefektifan sistem pengendalian internal dapat disebabkan antara lain faktor manusia, sehingga membuat kinerja organisasi menjadi buruk (Mokoginta et al, 2017;Prihanto & Gunawan, 2020) karena gangguan akibat tidak komitmen melakukan sistem dalam pelaporan tersebut. Sedangkan hasil penelitian ini juga tidak mendukung dan sejalan dengan hasil penelitian sebelumnya yang menyatakan bahwa adanya hubungan antara sistem laporan keuangan yang berkualitas dengan efektifnya sistem pengendalian internal (Aditya & Surjono, 2017;Faishol, 2016).…”

Contante Justitie System in Corruption Cases in Indonesia: A Legal Constructivism System Paradigm

“…Thus, corruption is a crime that is very detrimental and endangers the survival of the country. Handling corruption with anti-corruption efforts by state and internal institutions to prevent state losses does not appear to have produced satisfactory results because the numbers have not decreased (Prihanto & Gunawan, 2020).…”