Abstract:Children constitute 80% of all corrosive ingestion cases. The majority of this burden is contributed by developing countries. Accidental ingestion is common in younger children (< 5 years) while suicidal ingestion is more common in adolescents. The severity of injury depends on nature of corrosive (alkali or acid), pH, amount of ingestion and site of exposure. There are multiple doubts and dilemmas which exist in management of both acute ingestion and chronic complications. Acute ingestion leads to skin, respi… Show more
“…In this study, the median treatment interval was significantly longer in the EBD+stenting group than in the EBD group (10 vs. 4 months), which also confirmed the importance of stent placement after EBD. However, the migration rate after esophageal stent placement is high (22), and the possible complications including chest pain, reflux esophagitis, stent shedding, granulation tissue hyperplasia should not be ignored (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, EBD is suggested as the first and regular treatment step for children with esophageal stenosis shorter than 5 cm (22). Endoscopic stent placement is superior in maintaining continuous, radially oriented dilation pressures, and can serve as the first-line treatment for stenosis longer than 5 cm or recurrent stenosis.…”
ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment for congenital pediatric esophageal stenosis or pediatric stenosis that develops after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting and/or incision) for congenital esophageal stenosis or esophageal stenosis that developed after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia, between January 2010 and January 2019. The patients were periodically followed-up to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment by comparing the diameter of stricture and dysphagia score before and after procedures, and complications or recurrence.ResultsAll children successfully underwent the procedures. Fourteen of the 15 patients received endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) as the first step of treatment, but EBD alone only resolved the symptoms in two patients. The remaining patients received other comprehensive treatments, such as EBD with endoscopic incision (EI), EBD with stent replacement, or a combination of EBD, stent replacement, and EI. Eleven (11/15, 73.3%) patients experienced symptomatic relief after endoscopic treatment, and recurrence was noted in four patients on 3–36 months after the final endoscopic treatment. All four patients underwent esophageal surgery to relieve their symptoms. Until October 2021, all patients experienced symptom relief, and their dysphagia scores decreased from 3–4 to 0–1 during the follow-up period of 8–121 months. The average diameter of stenosis was increased from 0.34 cm (range 0.2–0.7 cm) to 1.03 cm (range 0.8–1.2 cm). No severe complications occurred during endoscopic treatment and follow-up.ConclusionsEndoscopic treatment is safe and effective for pediatric esophageal stenosis that is congenital or induced by chemical burns or surgical repair of esophageal atresia. Comparative large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.
“…In this study, the median treatment interval was significantly longer in the EBD+stenting group than in the EBD group (10 vs. 4 months), which also confirmed the importance of stent placement after EBD. However, the migration rate after esophageal stent placement is high (22), and the possible complications including chest pain, reflux esophagitis, stent shedding, granulation tissue hyperplasia should not be ignored (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, EBD is suggested as the first and regular treatment step for children with esophageal stenosis shorter than 5 cm (22). Endoscopic stent placement is superior in maintaining continuous, radially oriented dilation pressures, and can serve as the first-line treatment for stenosis longer than 5 cm or recurrent stenosis.…”
ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment for congenital pediatric esophageal stenosis or pediatric stenosis that develops after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic treatments (dilation and/or stenting and/or incision) for congenital esophageal stenosis or esophageal stenosis that developed after a chemical burn or surgical repair of esophageal atresia, between January 2010 and January 2019. The patients were periodically followed-up to assess the safety and efficacy of treatment by comparing the diameter of stricture and dysphagia score before and after procedures, and complications or recurrence.ResultsAll children successfully underwent the procedures. Fourteen of the 15 patients received endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) as the first step of treatment, but EBD alone only resolved the symptoms in two patients. The remaining patients received other comprehensive treatments, such as EBD with endoscopic incision (EI), EBD with stent replacement, or a combination of EBD, stent replacement, and EI. Eleven (11/15, 73.3%) patients experienced symptomatic relief after endoscopic treatment, and recurrence was noted in four patients on 3–36 months after the final endoscopic treatment. All four patients underwent esophageal surgery to relieve their symptoms. Until October 2021, all patients experienced symptom relief, and their dysphagia scores decreased from 3–4 to 0–1 during the follow-up period of 8–121 months. The average diameter of stenosis was increased from 0.34 cm (range 0.2–0.7 cm) to 1.03 cm (range 0.8–1.2 cm). No severe complications occurred during endoscopic treatment and follow-up.ConclusionsEndoscopic treatment is safe and effective for pediatric esophageal stenosis that is congenital or induced by chemical burns or surgical repair of esophageal atresia. Comparative large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.
“…Esophageal stricture is a narrowing of the esophageal lumen, often causing esophageal obstruction 1 2 . Dilation of strictures by endoscopy using balloon dilation is indicated to restore the patency of the esophageal lumen 3 . We present the case of a 55-year-old Japanese man who presented with chest discomfort.…”
“…Between 5000 and 18,000 cases of digestive tract lesions caused by ingestion of caustic or corrosive substances are reported yearly in the United States, from which around 80 % occur in young children, the remaining cases are mostly related to self-inflicted aggressions. Suicide attempt injuries of this nature are frequently life-threatening [1] . In developing countries, the incidence of severe caustic gastrointestinal lacerations is high and has been associated with social, economic, and educational factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In developing countries, the incidence of severe caustic gastrointestinal lacerations is high and has been associated with social, economic, and educational factors. Despite efforts to regulate the situation and educate the population, this type of injury still constitutes an important and frequently unreported public health issue, especially in low- and middle-income countries [1] , [2] .…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.