“…Galvanised steel has a critical chloride concentration 2 to 3 times higher than that for carbon steel, and since corrosion products are less voluminous than carbon steel then concrete is also less likely to crack (Williamson et al 2009). The corrosion rate for galvanised steel is also reduced by approximately 40% (Sistonen et al 2008).…”
Section: Chloride-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, there is little quantitative information about the performance of galvanised steel in carbonated concrete. Sistonen et al (2008) found that corrosion rate of galvanised steel did not change in carbonated concrete when compared to carbon steel. However, Bentur et al (1997) observed that corrosion rate increased in noncarbonated concrete, but then decreased when concrete was carbonated.…”
Section: Carbonation-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The protective film which surrounds stainless steel is stable at alkaline to neutral environments, and so stainless steel will not corrode in carbonated concrete (Nurnberger 2005, Sistonen et al 2008. On the other hand, there is little quantitative information about the performance of galvanised steel in carbonated concrete.…”
Section: Carbonation-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stainless steel is an effective adaptation measure, with Williamson et al (2009) suggesting that the critical chloride concentration is 10 to 50 times higher than that for carbon steel. Corrosion rate is observed to be reduced by a factor of 50 (Gu et al 1996, Sistonen et al 2008. Galvanised steel has a critical chloride concentration 2 to 3 times higher than that for carbon steel, and since corrosion products are less voluminous than carbon steel then concrete is also less likely to crack (Williamson et al 2009).…”
“…Galvanised steel has a critical chloride concentration 2 to 3 times higher than that for carbon steel, and since corrosion products are less voluminous than carbon steel then concrete is also less likely to crack (Williamson et al 2009). The corrosion rate for galvanised steel is also reduced by approximately 40% (Sistonen et al 2008).…”
Section: Chloride-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, there is little quantitative information about the performance of galvanised steel in carbonated concrete. Sistonen et al (2008) found that corrosion rate of galvanised steel did not change in carbonated concrete when compared to carbon steel. However, Bentur et al (1997) observed that corrosion rate increased in noncarbonated concrete, but then decreased when concrete was carbonated.…”
Section: Carbonation-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The protective film which surrounds stainless steel is stable at alkaline to neutral environments, and so stainless steel will not corrode in carbonated concrete (Nurnberger 2005, Sistonen et al 2008. On the other hand, there is little quantitative information about the performance of galvanised steel in carbonated concrete.…”
Section: Carbonation-induced Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stainless steel is an effective adaptation measure, with Williamson et al (2009) suggesting that the critical chloride concentration is 10 to 50 times higher than that for carbon steel. Corrosion rate is observed to be reduced by a factor of 50 (Gu et al 1996, Sistonen et al 2008. Galvanised steel has a critical chloride concentration 2 to 3 times higher than that for carbon steel, and since corrosion products are less voluminous than carbon steel then concrete is also less likely to crack (Williamson et al 2009).…”
“…This bond does not only depend on the surrounding matrix, but also the reinforcement geometry (Sistonen et al, 2001 [3] ; El Zareef and Schlaich, 2008 [4] ; Desnerck and De Schutter, 2010 [5] ; Farghal Maree and Hilal Riad, 2014 [6] ). Bond mechanisms include chemical adhesion, friction and mechanical interlock.…”
Abstract:Low weight, self-levelling, high workability and thermal insulating properties make lightweight foamed concrete (LWFC) an attractive substitute for normal weight concrete (NWC). The unfamiliarity of LWFC and paucity of design guidance pose concern for its use in structural application. One such concern is the bonding of steel reinforcement within LWFC. The bond behaviour of deformed steel reinforcement (rebar), embedded in LWFC and NWC was tested using pull-out (PO) and the beam-end (BE) tests [1] . The concretes used for testing were a reference NWC and LWFC with casting densities of 1200, 1400 and 1600 kg/m 3 . The nominal diameters of rebar used were Y10, Y12 and Y20 at embedded lengths of 3, 4 and 5 nominal bar diameters. Characterization of these materials included compressive strength, Young's modulus, tensile splitting strength and wedge splitting fracture energy.The bond-slip envelopes of the denser LWFC yield significant bond stress magnitudes, but lack the ductility in failure observed in the NWC tests. The least dense LWFC exhibits ductility during failure, but lacks sufficient bonding stress magnitude. A significant difference in bond behaviour is observed between the results of the PO tests and the BE tests. The interaction of LWFC fracture and rebar bond mechanisms in the BE tests in the presence of shear and bending moment, is the direct cause, and the relatively low fracture toughness leads to low apparent bond resistance. Through this understanding, material improvement is envisaged by inclusion of aggregate to increase cracking tortuosity and thereby fracture energy of LWFC, in order to improve rebar bond in LWFC.
Low weight and thermal insulating properties make lightweight foamed concrete (LWFC) an attractive substitute for normal‐weight concrete (NWC). The unfamiliarity and paucity of design guidance challenge the structural use of LWFC. One concern is the bond of steel reinforcement in LWFC. This paper presents the results of pull‐out bond tests and beam‐end bond tests. The parameters were a reference NWC and LWFC with densities of 1,200, 1,400, and 1,600 kg/m3 and rebar diameters of 10, 12, and 20 mm with embedded lengths of 3, 4, and 5 bar diameters. All concretes were characterized in terms of strength, stiffness, and fracture energy. Clear differences in bond resistance were found from the two tests. The bond in LWFC is lower than that in NWC. The results suggest that the development of LWFC materials to increase fracture energy has the potential to increase the bond.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.