Corrosion Behavior of Tantalum-Coated Cobalt–Chromium Modular Necks Compared to Titanium Modular Necks in a Simulator Test

Dorn, U.; Neumann, Daniel; Frank, Mario

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.022

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Chemomechanical stress is reported to be higher in titanium modular necks compared with cobalt-chromium bimodular necks. This also is true in femoral stems used for primary THA compared with stems used in revisions owing to the longer and larger anchorage cones of revision stems [7,9,11,16,33].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA

Pour

Borden

Murayama

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The bimodular femoral neck implant (modularity in the neck section and prosthetic head) offers several implant advantages to the surgeon performing THAs, however, there have been reports of failure of bimodular femoral implants involving neck fractures or adverse tissue reaction to metal debris. We aimed to assess the results of the bimodular implants used in the THAs we performed. Questions/purposes We asked: (1) What is the survivorship of the PROFEMUR 1 bimodular femoral neck stems? (2) What are the modes of failure of this bimodular femoral neck implant? (3) What are the major risk factors for the major modes of failure of this device?Methods Between 2003 and 2009, we used one family of bimodular femoral neck stems for all primary THAs (PRO-FEMUR 1 Z and PROFEMUR 1 E). During this period, 277 THAs (in 242 patients) were performed with these implants. One hundred seventy were done with the bimodular PROFE-MUR 1 E (all are accounted for here), and when that implant was suspected of having a high risk of failure, the bimodular PROFEMUR 1 Z was used instead. One hundred seven THAs were performed using this implant (all are accounted for in this study). All bearing combinations, including metal-on-metal, metal-on-polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic, are included here. Data for the cohort included patient demographics, BMI, implant dimensions, type of articular surface, length of followup, and C-reactive protein serum level. We assessed survivorship of the two stems using Kaplan-Meier curves and determined the frequency of the different modes of stem failure. For each of the major modes of failure, we performed binary logistic regression to identify associated risk factors. Results Survivorship of the stems, using aseptic revision as the endpoint, was 85% for the patients with the PROFE-MUR 1 E stems with a mean followup of 50 months (range, 1-125 months) and 85% for the PROFEMUR 1 Z with a mean followup of 50 months (range, 1-125 months)(95% CI, 74-87 months). The most common modes of failure were loosening (9% for the PROFEMUR 1 E), neck fracture (6% for the PROFEMUR 1 Z and 0.6% for the PROFEMUR 1 E), metallosis (1%), and periprosthetic fracture (1%). Only the bimodular PROFEMUR 1 E was associated with femoral stem loosening (odds ratio [OR] =1.1; 95% CI, 1.04-1.140; p = 0.032). Larger head (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 0.7-14; p = 0.096), BMI (OR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1-1.4; p = 0.038) and total offset (OR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.9; p = 0.039) were associated with neck fracture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High Risk of Failure With Bimodular Femoral Components in THA

Pour

Borden

Murayama

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There have been many studies in which the durability of artificial hip stems was evaluated by finite element analysis (FEM) simulation in accordance with the ISO 7206 series [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Also, additive manufacturing (AM) is expected to be a new technology for manufacturing biocompatible Ti orthopedic implants such as custom-made implants.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical Performance of Artificial Hip Stems Manufactured by Hot Forging and Selective Laser Melting Using Biocompatible Ti-15Zr-4Nb Alloy

Okazaki

Mori²

2021

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated the microstructures, tensile properties, fatigue strengths, and durability limits of hot-forged Ti-15Zr-4Nb (Ti-15-4) alloy artificial hip stems. These properties were compared with those of Ti-15Zr-4Nb-4Ta (Ti-15-4-4) and Ti-6Al-4V (Ti-6-4) alloy stems annealed after selective laser melting. The tensile and fatigue properties of test specimens cut from Ti-15-4 stems annealed after hot forging were excellent compared with those of the Alloclassic Zweymüller Stepless (SL) stem, which is used globally. The 0.2% proof stress (σ0.2%PS), ultimate tensile strength (σUTS), total elongation (TE) at breaking, and fatigue strength (σFS) after 107 cycles were 919 ± 10, 983 ± 9 MPa, 21 ± 1%, and 855 ± 14 MPa, respectively. The durability limit (PD) after 5 × 106 cycles of Ti-15-4 stems was excellent compared with that of the SL stem. The σUTS values of 90°- and 0°-direction-built Ti-15-4-4 rods were 1032 ± 1 and 1022 ± 2 MPa, and their TE values were 14 ± 1% and 16 ± 1%, respectively. The σFS values of annealed 90°-direction-built Ti-15-4-4 and Ti-6-4 rods were 640 ± 11 and 680 ± 37 MPa, respectively, which were close to that of the wrought Ti-15-4 rod (785 ± 17 MPa). These findings indicate that the hot forging and selective laser melting (SLM) techniques can also be applied to the manufacture of artificial hip prostheses. In particular, it was clarified that selective laser melting using Ti-15-4-4 and Ti-6-4 powders is useful for the low-cost manufacturing of custom-made artificial joint prostheses and other prosthetic implants.

show abstract