2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to ‘Trends and recent development of the microelectrode arrays (MEAs)’ [Biosens. Bioelectr., 175: 112854]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing Among the electrical sensors that invasively contact the cell culture environment, the micro-scale working volume on the electrode array chip for cell monitoring has been typical from the birth of the microelectrode array (MEA) chip. [17][18][19]34,[58][59][60][61] However, the most common approaches toward the cell-to-culture ware interface impedimetric sensing target involve cell contact or motile ability. [47,62,63] One example is Rapier et al reported a simple and intrinsic microfluidic sensory system based on impedimetric sensing for determining cell location and confluency.…”
Section: Electrical Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical cell-substrate impedance sensing Among the electrical sensors that invasively contact the cell culture environment, the micro-scale working volume on the electrode array chip for cell monitoring has been typical from the birth of the microelectrode array (MEA) chip. [17][18][19]34,[58][59][60][61] However, the most common approaches toward the cell-to-culture ware interface impedimetric sensing target involve cell contact or motile ability. [47,62,63] One example is Rapier et al reported a simple and intrinsic microfluidic sensory system based on impedimetric sensing for determining cell location and confluency.…”
Section: Electrical Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in detail, MEAs are common bioelectronics platforms engineered to connect an electronic circuitry with different cell types to captures the field potential or activity across an entire population of cells, by measuring biological signals at multiple points, thus detecting activity patterns that would otherwise elude traditional assays. [186][187][188] Hence, the miniaturized electrodes, featuring multiple plates or shanks, enhance the tissue-electronic circuit interaction allowing recording by transducing ionically mediated voltage changes in the biological environment into electronic currents [189,190] but also stimulation by reversing the transduction direction. [191,192] In this context, even though conventional electronics materials have been widely employed, CPs have been introduced as coatings to decrease the electrodes impedance enhancing the electrode-tissue interaction and electrical properties of conventional metal-or semiconductor-based bioelectric signal transducers.…”
Section: Organic Platforms: the Vehicles To Reach The Destinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recording cellular activity at high spatiotemporal resolution from soft tissue/organ systems with microelectrodes is a critical component of many biomedical research and clinical applications, including basic physiology studies, investigations of disease, and the development of disease therapies. [1][2][3][4] Despite their tremendous impact on classic electrophysiological research, microelectrodes are unable to readout important functional parameters such as intracellular calcium dynamics, metabolic activity, or target specific cell types. In recent years, optical techniques such as high speed fluorescence imaging have been widely used to measure important cellular parameters (e.g., membrane potentials and intracellular calcium) and optogenetics has been used to manipulate cells or circuits with cell-type specificity through the incorporation of lightsensitive proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%