Corrigendum to “The use of carbon dioxide in microbial electrosynthesis: Advancements, sustainability and economic feasibility” [Journal of CO2 Utilization 18 (2017) 390-399]

Christodoulou, Xenia; Okoroafor, Tobechi; Parry, Simon; Velásquez-Orta, Sharon B.

doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.11.006

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To further justify the feasibility of this proposed hybrid BES that introduced an EESC into the microbial electrochemical system, a techno-economic model was developed (details in the STAR Methods and Table S2) (Christodoulou et al, 2017;Christodoulou and Velasquez-Orta, 2016;Claassens et al, 2019;Rieth and Nocera, 2020). It had to be noted that this model was set to describe the scaled-up production using the hybrid BES in the future and therefore contained many conjectural assumptions.…”

Section: Techno-economic Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Microbial electrosynthesis cells can provide comprehensive solutions for wastewater-energy-chemicals nexus by extracting the wastewater energy and efficiently converting it into various value-added chemicals (Harnisch and Schroder, 2010;Zou and He, 2018). In particular, the integration of microbial electrosynthesis cells with MFCs has accomplished the wastewater-powered production of different commodities, such as biomethane (Ning et al, 2021), acetic acid (Nevin et al, 2010), butanol (Zaybak et al, 2013), and hexanol (Vassilev et al, 2018), thereby opening the window for bringing value to wastewater treatment (Christodoulou et al, 2017;Jiang and Zeng, 2018). A study on microbial electrosynthesis reported that in situ electrode potential modulation and control can be achieved through the introduction of additional '''pin''' electrodes (Gajda et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Wastewater-powered high-value chemical synthesis in a hybrid bioelectrochemical system

Wang

et al. 2021

iScience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Techno-economic Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wastewater-powered high-value chemical synthesis in a hybrid bioelectrochemical system

Wang

et al. 2021

iScience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding inputs to the production of materials and fuel, the scientific literature largely observes increased production costs through CCU. Many studies measure significant cost increases due to energy or catalyst costs (Christodoulou, Okoroafor, Parry, & Velasquez-Orta, 2017;Dimitriou et al, 2015;Mehleri, Bhave, Shah, Fennell, & MacDowell, 2015). Equally, CO 2 capture requires large investments from high-emitting producers, and further efficiency gains and policy support are needed (Senftle & Carter, 2017).…”

Section: Findings From Reviewing Scientific Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the same time, such products can be compatible with existing supply chains and markets (Dimitriou et al, 2015;Pérez-Fortes et al, 2014b). To develop successful products, Christodoulou et al (2017) recommend investigating market saturation. Few studies conclude that their investigated technologies are already economically viable (Kim, Ryi, & Lim, 2018;Masel et al, 2014;Putra, Juwari, & Handogo, 2017).…”

Section: Findings From Reviewing Scientific Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Few studies conclude that their investigated technologies are already economically viable (Kim, Ryi, & Lim, 2018;Masel et al, 2014;Putra, Juwari, & Handogo, 2017). Instead, many evaluated technologies cannot compete under current market conditions (Christodoulou et al, 2017;Kuenen, Mengers, Nijmeijer, van der Ham, & Kiss, 2016). Through sensitivity analyses, several studies provide case-specific guidance on how economic performance can be improved (Zhang et al, 2015(Zhang et al, ,2017.…”

Section: Findings From Reviewing Scientific Papersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Economic aspirations connected to innovations in carbon capture and utilization value chains

Naims

2020

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International authorities are increasingly recognizing that utilizing the carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions from various industries can assist strategies for mitigating climate change. In developing novel carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies they aspire to contribute to circular economy targets and reduce consumption of fossil-based raw materials. However, the potential economic effects of CCU on industrial value chains remain unclear. Hence, this study investigates the economic expectations placed on those actors currently conducting research and development (R&D) in CCU. The aspired levels of economic performance are identified through a systematic literature review of 19 policy advice reports and 15 scientific papers. Qualitative directed content analysis is conducted, based on an R&D input-output-outcome system. First, we identify three relevant groups of value chain actors by clustering industrial sectors: (a) equipment manufacturers, (b) high-emitting producers, and (c) producers of materials and fuels. Then, we derive a criteria list from the review. Finally, the analysis reveals how CCU innovations are anticipated to impact different industries: Equipment manufacturers could contribute to economic growth. For highemitting producers, CCU provides one option for "surviving" sustainability transitions. Meanwhile, material and fuel producers need to act as "problem solvers" by offering competitive ways of utilizing CO 2. We conclude by identifying research gaps that should be addressed to better understand the economic and social dimensions of CCU and to increase the chances of such innovations contributing to broader sustainability transformations of industrial and energy systems. K E Y W O R D S carbon capture and utilization, carbon dioxide, industrial ecology, industrial symbiosis, technological innovation, value chains 1 INTRODUCTION Most of the materials and products that surround us in our everyday lives are carbon based. Modern standards of living are therefore closely connected to the availability of natural carbon resources such as wood, soil, coal, and oil. In order to conserve these resources for future generations and find more sustainable modes of consumption, an increasing amount of research is looking at ways of reusing and recycling raw materials. Often, such efforts are undertaken to close material loops in line with the vision of transitioning toward a circular economy. Redesigning value chains and reconsidering material use are key elements of this endeavor (Pérez-Fortes, Bocin-Dumitriu, & Tzimas, 2014b; World Economic Forum, 2014). Several processes can contribute to achieving a circular economy, among them utilization of residual materials (Kreikebaum, 2002) and various types of recycling-from high-value, direct material reuse to lower-value thermic recycling (von Stengel, 1999). The utilization of "waste" CO 2 This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the...

show abstract

Bioelectrochemical systems for biogas upgrading and biomethane production

Aryal

Ottosen

Bentien

et al. 2021

Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Corrigendum to “The use of carbon dioxide in microbial electrosynthesis: Advancements, sustainability and economic feasibility” [Journal of CO2 Utilization 18 (2017) 390-399]

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Wastewater-powered high-value chemical synthesis in a hybrid bioelectrochemical system

Wastewater-powered high-value chemical synthesis in a hybrid bioelectrochemical system

Economic aspirations connected to innovations in carbon capture and utilization value chains

Bioelectrochemical systems for biogas upgrading and biomethane production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About