Corrigendum to “Review of the micro-tubular solid oxide fuel cell: Part I. Stack design issues and research activities” [J. Power Sources 193/1 (2009) 387–399]

A comparison on the dynamical performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) with traditional serpentine and an open pore cellular foam material flow channel

“…Based on the simplified Butler -Volmer equation, the activation loss is given by Spiegel [6] and it is described by Eq. (15).…”

Internal current collection and thermofluidynamic enhancement in a microtubular SOFC

“…However, the internal design comes with its own limitations. Ensuring a sufficient contact area and contact force/pressure between the internal current collector and the electrode throughout the cell operation lifetime is imperative to minimise contact resistance and its effect on the cell ASR [20,21].…”

Numerical modelling and CFD simulation of a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell flow channel using an open pore cellular foam material

“…It is also very expensive to machine. With the bipolar plate accounting for almost 70% of the weight of the entire cell according to Lawlor et 2009, Dong et al, 2007, it is recommended that the material for the bipolar plate be made lighter as nearly 40% of the cost of a fuel cell depends on the bipolar plate.…”