2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Phenomenological study of the micro- and macroscopic mechanisms during polymer flooding with SiO2 nanoparticles” [J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 198, (2021) 108135]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the experiments with ASP + SiO 2 , the differential pressure showed a higher value (181.39 kPa) compared to that (122.01 kPa) with ASP at the end of the subsequent water injection. This is due to the retention/mechanical entrapment of nanoparticles and the Pickering emulsions in a core . This reflects that the injected water was turned into the lower-permeability layer due to the blocking effect of HPAM/ASP/ASP + SiO 2 in the higher-permeability layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in the experiments with ASP + SiO 2 , the differential pressure showed a higher value (181.39 kPa) compared to that (122.01 kPa) with ASP at the end of the subsequent water injection. This is due to the retention/mechanical entrapment of nanoparticles and the Pickering emulsions in a core . This reflects that the injected water was turned into the lower-permeability layer due to the blocking effect of HPAM/ASP/ASP + SiO 2 in the higher-permeability layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the retention/ mechanical entrapment of nanoparticles and the Pickering emulsions in a core. 48 This reflects that the injected water was turned into the lower-permeability layer due to the blocking effect of HPAM/ASP/ASP + SiO 2 in the higher-permeability layer.…”
Section: Stage Iii: Subsequent Water Floodingmentioning
confidence: 99%