2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households” [Energy Policy 39 (2011) 3572–3581]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all of these options lead to CO2 emissions, total CO2 savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase -a phenomenon known as 'backfire' (Druckman et al, 2011). More broadly, there is some literature suggesting that some of the groups that are more likely to travel with active modes are also more likely to fly, e.g.…”
Section: Empirical Work: Cross-sectional and Longitudinalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since all of these options lead to CO2 emissions, total CO2 savings may be less than anticipated. Indeed, in some instances, emissions may increase -a phenomenon known as 'backfire' (Druckman et al, 2011). More broadly, there is some literature suggesting that some of the groups that are more likely to travel with active modes are also more likely to fly, e.g.…”
Section: Empirical Work: Cross-sectional and Longitudinalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, I have not seen a controlled empirical study on the indirect rebound effects on CO2 emissions of a mode shift to active travel (causation). Druckman et al (Druckman et al, 2011) derived a best estimate of the rebound effect of mode shift to active travel at about 25% (so only 75% of the direct transport cost savings would materialise if other activities were taken into account). Yet this was based on assumptions on what could happen, but not what did happen.…”
Section: Empirical Work: Cross-sectional and Longitudinalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current assessments tend to focus on individual S-BMs (e.g. Goedkoop et al, 1999;Lindahl et al, 2014), and thus neglect rebound effects, the extent of substitution of existing resources, and the impacts of associated BMs (Druckman et al, 2012). This part of the research agenda is as much a methodological question as it is one about actual impacts.…”
Section: Rq1 To What Extent Are Interactions Between Business Models mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, unless a S-BM uses resources already available in the system (as for example carpooling does), it comes with additional material and energy use (dI): new cars and bikes are introduced into the system. Second, S-BM may have rebound effects(Druckman et al, 2012), whenever the associated behavioural change and cost savings lead to additional consumption (iI). For platform-based S-BM, this includes any additional consumption that results from the marketing which is generated through the private data collected and sold to other firms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Οι εμπειρικές εκτιμήσεις του αποτελέσματος ανάδρασης επικεντρώνονται είτε στη συμπεριφορά του παραγωγού είτε στη συμπεριφορά του καταναλωτή (Greening et al, 2000). Ενδέχεται το αποτέλεσμα ανάδρασης να οφείλεται στον τρόπο που αντιδρά η συμπεριφορά των καταναλωτών στη τεχνολογική βελτίωση (Binswanger, 2001;Druckman et al, 2011).Το αποτέλεσμα ανάδρασης εκτιμάται στο 34% στα νοικοκυριά της Μεγάλης Βρετανίας (Druckman et al, 2011), ενώ η υπόθεση της ανάδρασης φαίνεται να επιβεβαιώνεται και στη Σκωτία (Hanley et al, 2009). Το αποτέλεσμα ανάδρασης στις υπηρεσίες οικιακής ενέργειας (household energy services) στις χώρες του ΟΟΣΑ εκτιμάται περίπου στο 30% (Sorrell et al, 2009).…”
Section: το αποτέλεσμα ανάδρασης της εξοικονόμησης ενέργειαςunclassified