2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Development and psychometric analysis of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT)” [Neuromuscular Disorders 25 (2015) 937–944]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Landfeldt et al [ 8 ], who developed the original DMDSAT. Among 186 patients from the United Kingdom, DMDSAT showed very good reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were reported by Landfeldt et al [ 8 ], who developed the original DMDSAT. Among 186 patients from the United Kingdom, DMDSAT showed very good reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The original score ranges from 0 to 8 in both domains, with a higher score representing a more difficult activity. However, with the rescoring system [ 8 ], the score ranges from 0 to 6 in the arm function domain and from 0 to 5 in the mobility domain ( Appendix 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations