2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Density functional theory calculations of self- and Xe diffusion in U3Si2” [J. Nucl. Mater. 515 (2019) 312–325]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these details were not provided in ref. 25. Besides, it is not clear if any corrections such as the HSE hybrid functional 64 were applied in their work, while under Si-rich condition the Si chemical potential of À6.19 eV is similar to the value of À6.28 eV obtained by the HSE hybrid functional.…”
Section: The Defect Formation Energies For U 3 Simentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, these details were not provided in ref. 25. Besides, it is not clear if any corrections such as the HSE hybrid functional 64 were applied in their work, while under Si-rich condition the Si chemical potential of À6.19 eV is similar to the value of À6.28 eV obtained by the HSE hybrid functional.…”
Section: The Defect Formation Energies For U 3 Simentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this study and ref. 25, the MAGMOM parameter was set to be 6 and 1, respectively. Table 4 compares the optimized magnetic moment, lattice parameters and total energies for ideal and defective U 3 Si 2 obtained by different MAGMOM values.…”
Section: The Defect Formation Energies For U 3 Simentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations