Corrigendum to “Characterization of lead glazed potteries from Smyrna (İzmir/Turkey) using multiple analytical techniques; Part II: Body” [Ceram. Int. 40 (2014) 2153–2160]

Özçatal, Melih; Yaygıngöl, M.; İssi, Ali; Kara, Alpagut; Turan, Servet; Okyar, F.; Pfeiffer-Taş, Şule; Nastova, Irena; Grupče, Orhideja; Minčeva-Šukarova, Biljana

doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.022

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, XRF generates representative data for a sample owing to its comparatively wide analytical area (from several to several‐tens millimeters diameter) compared with laser ablation ICP‐MS (e.g., Palumbi, Gratuze, Harutyunyan, Chataigner, and Archaeol), which can perform direct solid measurement with a very narrow analytical area (micrometer order). Generally, XRF directly measures solid samples (e.g., Princé et al) or assays a glass bead (e.g., Özçatal et al), powder pellet (e.g., Barone, Mazzoleni, Aquilia, and Barbera), and loose powder (e.g., Vleeschouwer, Renson, Claeys, Nys, and Bindler) prepared from a powdered sample. These specimens' characteristics are described elsewhere .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Provenance determination of prehistorical pottery from Oshima Island belonging to Izu islands (Tokyo, Japan) using X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A total of 41 pottery shards originating in the Jomon period (14000–300 BC) and Yayoi period (300 BC–250 AD) were excavated from the Shimotakabora site on Oshima Island of the Izu islands (Tokyo, Japan). X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry was used to determine the chemical composition (10 major oxides and 12 minor elements) of the potteries to identify the potteries' provenance, that is, local or nonlocal product. The calibration curves were drawn by synthetic standards prepared from a mixture of chemical reagents containing analytes, which presented good accuracy and reproducibility by analysis of the geochemical references. The pottery samples were classified by multivariate statistics such as principal component analysis and cluster analysis based on their chemical composition. Additionally, the X‐ray fluorescence results were compared with geochemical data from Oshima Island using scatter diagrams. The pottery provenance was identified by their classification. This provenance estimation indicates that 37 of the 41 potteries were brought to Oshima island from Japan's main island, Honshu, in the prehistoric age.

show abstract