2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to “Catalyst for ultra-low sulfur and aromatic diesel” [Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 282 (2005) 227–235]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HDS is highly efficient for removal of thiols, sulfides, and disulfides, but not for aromatic thiophenes especially the alkyl-dibenzothiophenes [1]. Poly-alkyl-diaromatic and dibenzothiophenes (DBT) are the most refractive compounds for hydrodesulfurization and require high temperature and pressure, which creates many problems; including high investment, high operating cost, reduction of length of the catalyst cycle and increase in the hydrogen consumption due to the hydrogenation of olefin and aromatic compounds present in fuels [2,3]. For these reasons, alternative desulfurization processes are necessary for producing clean fuels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HDS is highly efficient for removal of thiols, sulfides, and disulfides, but not for aromatic thiophenes especially the alkyl-dibenzothiophenes [1]. Poly-alkyl-diaromatic and dibenzothiophenes (DBT) are the most refractive compounds for hydrodesulfurization and require high temperature and pressure, which creates many problems; including high investment, high operating cost, reduction of length of the catalyst cycle and increase in the hydrogen consumption due to the hydrogenation of olefin and aromatic compounds present in fuels [2,3]. For these reasons, alternative desulfurization processes are necessary for producing clean fuels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last 20 years the sulphur content of diesel fuels has been reduced stepwise from 1% to 50 ppm by January, 2005 and will be tightened to 10 ppm by January, 2009 [1][2][3]. Reasons of sulphur reduction are the environmental protection and the conservation of the activity of aftertreatment catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more severe requirements are scheduled in the near future which may include restrictions not only for polyaromatics but also for the total aromatic content of diesel fuels. Beside quality requirements, demand for the transportation diesel fuels (mainly in the European Union) is also increasing [1][2][3]. It is expected that deep hydrodearomatization and hydrodesulphurization of gas oils may be needed in order to satisfy these requirements [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%