2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum: The Dancers' Visuospatial Body Map Explains Their Enhanced Divergence in the Production of Motor Forms: Evidence in the Early Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In exercise sciences, the ingredients of PF are well-established and include strength/power, endurance, agility and flexibility (Jeffreys and Moody, 2016). The corresponding features of cognitive performance include focus intensity (Sherlin et al, 2013) for strength, attention span and mental effort tolerance (Aidman et al, 2002(Aidman et al, , 2016Aidman, 2005) for endurance, task shifting (Genet and Siemer, 2011), cognitive flexibility and creativity (Palmiero et al, 2019) for flexibility, and adaptability (Chandra and Leong, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019) and self-regulation (Schunk and Greene, 2017) for agility. Research evidence accumulated in sport psychology and other high-performance contexts, points to the same core domains of cognitive functioning, while their relative importance may depend on the specifics of task and mission profiles under consideration.…”
Section: Cognitive Fitness Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In exercise sciences, the ingredients of PF are well-established and include strength/power, endurance, agility and flexibility (Jeffreys and Moody, 2016). The corresponding features of cognitive performance include focus intensity (Sherlin et al, 2013) for strength, attention span and mental effort tolerance (Aidman et al, 2002(Aidman et al, , 2016Aidman, 2005) for endurance, task shifting (Genet and Siemer, 2011), cognitive flexibility and creativity (Palmiero et al, 2019) for flexibility, and adaptability (Chandra and Leong, 2016;Zhang et al, 2019) and self-regulation (Schunk and Greene, 2017) for agility. Research evidence accumulated in sport psychology and other high-performance contexts, points to the same core domains of cognitive functioning, while their relative importance may depend on the specifics of task and mission profiles under consideration.…”
Section: Cognitive Fitness Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies might consider more systematically that verbal and figural/visuo-spatial abilities rely on both multi-componential and specific neural networks (Boccia et al, 2015), and the extent to which these abilities are selectively altered by different FTD variants. In this direction, future studies could also explore if different forms of DT (i.e., visual, musical, and motor -see Palmiero et al, 2019Palmiero et al, , 2020) can be used to bypass language deficits (i.e., agrammatism and impaired fluency) of patients with non-fluent and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia to assess their creative cognition abilities; they are indeed characterized by the sparing in semantic and episodic memory networks and, at least in part, in the control functions needed to accomplish this type of tasks. In this direction, future studies could also explore whether different forms of DT (i.e., visual, musical, andmotor -see Palmiero et al, 2019, 2020) can be used to bypass the language deficits (i.e., agrammatism and impaired fluency) of patients with nonfluent and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia to assess their creative cognition abilities.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%