Corrigendum: Positive Psychology Micro-Coaching Intervention: Effects on Psychological Capital and Goal-Related Self-Efficacy

Corbu, Alina; Zuberbühler, María Josefina Peláez; Salanova, Marisa

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669283

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its working mechanism con rms the positive and direct effect of PPI, including that positive belief could help individuals to intentionality and motivation under negative situations, positive cognition and positive emotion facilitate to maintain hope and optimism to the future, and positive personal resources to bring effort and persistence. Based on the assumption that the PPI could promote individual's positive characteristics and ability to grow their resources, our results are consistent with previous research, which con rms that interventions related to positive psychology provide the perfect conditions and environment for the development of psychological capital [33,34,35]. It should be noted that in psychological capital, although the self-e cacy score of the intervention group was increased compared with the control group, we did not nd the PPI on self-e cacy is as signi as the effect of PPI on hope, optimism, and resilience.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

The efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention on well-being for colostomy patients: a randomized controlled trial

Jin

Wang

et al. 2022

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the e cacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention (PPI) on the psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction among colostomy patients. MethodsPatients (n=120) with permanent stomas were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Patients in the experimental group (n=60) received standard care and PPI, whereas patients in the control group (n=60) only received standard care. The psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction were measured and compared between two groups before the intervention, the immediate post-intervention, and follow-up. ResultsAll 120 patients completed the study. The hope, optimism, resilience, psychological distress, and life satisfaction score of the experimental group were signi cantly higher than those of the control group at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). Self-e cacy score of the experimental group had no signi cant difference at the two-time points after the intervention than the control group (P>0.05). Changes in hope and resilience which belong to psychological capital mediated the intervention's e cacy on changes in PPI on life satisfaction (β = 0.265, P=0.005; β = 0.686, P=0.002). ConclusionsPPI could effectively improve psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction among patients with stomas. Besides, our ndings add novel support that increased hope and resilience are the active ingredients that promote intervention change.in thinking about a person's positive future and formulating ways to achieve goals, we believe it makes sense that increased psychological capital, including self-e cacy, hope, optimism, and resilience, mediates the effects of PPI on well-being. And these mediating variables may occur simultaneously with changes in well-being.Therefore, the main purpose of our study is to examine the e cacy of PPI on improving well-being (i.e., increasing life satisfaction and decreasing psychological stress) among patients with a stoma. In addition, we considered that psychological capital is the mediating active ingredient of PPI to improve life satisfaction and reduce psychological stress, thus, our secondary purpose is to examine the e cacy of the PPI in increasing psychological capital (selfe cacy, hope, optimism, and resilience). Finally, in order to better understand the psychological processes that make a PPI e cacious, this study would use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to explore the action mechanism of a speci c intervention in increasing well-being. Methods DesignWe conducted a single-blinded, double-arm parallel, randomized controlled trial in a general hospital in northern China from 1 January 2019-1 January 2020. This trial was approved by the human research ethics committee of the hospital, and it was registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR2100052179).Sample size G*Power 3.1.3 was employed to estimate the sample size. Referencing a study on the effect of PPI on the well-being of breast cancer patients [18], we took the power of 0.8 with an ...

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

The efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention on well-being for colostomy patients: a randomized controlled trial

Jin

Wang

et al. 2022

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Its working mechanism con rms the positive and direct effect of PPI, including that positive belief could help individuals to intentionality and motivation under negative situations, positive cognition and positive emotion facilitate to maintain hope and optimism to the future, and positive personal resources to bring effort and persistence. Based on the assumption that the PPI could promote individual's positive characteristics and ability to grow their resources, our results are consistent with previous research, which con rms that interventions related to positive psychology provide the perfect conditions and environment for the development of psychological capital [33,34,35]. It should be noted that psychological capital, although self-e cacy score of the intervention group was increased compared with the control group, we did not nd that effect of PPI on self-e cacy is as signi cant as the effect of PPI on hope, optimism, and resilience.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

The Efficacy and Mechanism of Positive Psychological Intervention on Well-Being for Colostomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jin

Wang

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention (PPI) on the psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction among colostomy patients. Methods Patients (n=120) with permanent stomas were recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Patients in the experimental group (n=60) received standard care and PPI, whereas patients in the control group (n=60) only received standard care. The psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction were measured and compared between two groups before the intervention, the immediate post-intervention, and follow-up. Results All 120 patients completed the study. The hope, optimism, resilience, psychological distress, and life satisfaction score of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). Self-efficacy score of the experimental group had no significant difference at the two-time points after the intervention than the control group (P>0.05). Changes in hope and resilience which belong to psychological capital mediated the intervention’s efficacy on changes in PPI on life satisfaction (β = 0.265, P=0.005; β = 0.686, P=0.002). Conclusions PPI could effectively improve psychological capital, psychological distress, and life satisfaction among patients with stomas. Besides, our findings add novel support that increased hope and resilience are the active ingredients that promote intervention change.

show abstract

“…Psychological capital belongs to the category of positive psychology, which emphasizes individual strength and enthusiasm ( 51 , 52 ). Our study shows that COVID-19 patients with good psychological capital tend to have a high sense of security, and it is an important predictor of patients' security that can independently explain 18.70% of the variation in security, which is consistent with the results of Eweida et al ( 28 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Latent profile analysis of security among patients with COVID-19 infection in mobile cabin hospitals and its relationship with psychological capital

Yan

et al. 2022

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimCOVID-19 patients' security is related to their mental health. However, the classification of this group's sense of security is still unclear. The aim of our research is to clarify the subtypes of security of patients infected with COVID-19, explore the factors affecting profile membership, and examine the relationship between security and psychological capital for the purpose of providing a reference for improving patients' sense of security and mental health.MethodsA total of 650 COVID-19 patients in a mobile cabin hospital were selected for a cross-sectional survey from April to May 2022. They completed online self-report questionnaires that included a demographic questionnaire, security scale, and psychological capital scale. Data analysis included latent profile analysis, variance analysis, the Chi-square test, multiple comparisons, multivariate logistical regression, and hierarchical regression analysis.ResultsThree latent profiles were identified—low security (Class 1), moderate security (Class 2), and high security (Class 3)—accounting for 12.00, 49.51, and 38.49% of the total surveyed patients, respectively. In terms of the score of security and its two dimensions, Class 3 was higher than Class 2, and Class 2 was higher than Class 1 (all P < 0.001). Patients with difficulty falling asleep, sleep quality as usual, and lower tenacity were more likely to be grouped into Class 1 rather than Class 3; Patients from families with a per capita monthly household income <3,000 and lower self-efficacy and hope were more likely to be grouped into Classes 1 and 2 than into Class 3. Psychological capital was an important predictor of security, which could independently explain 18.70% of the variation in the patients' security.ConclusionsSecurity has different classification features among patients with COVID-19 infection in mobile cabin hospitals. The security of over half of the patients surveyed is at the lower or middle level, and psychological capital is an important predictor of the patients' security. Medical staff should actively pay attention to patients with low security and help them to improve their security level and psychological capital.

show abstract

Corrigendum: Positive Psychology Micro-Coaching Intervention: Effects on Psychological Capital and Goal-Related Self-Efficacy

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

The efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention on well-being for colostomy patients: a randomized controlled trial

The efficacy and mechanism of positive psychological intervention on well-being for colostomy patients: a randomized controlled trial

The Efficacy and Mechanism of Positive Psychological Intervention on Well-Being for Colostomy Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Latent profile analysis of security among patients with COVID-19 infection in mobile cabin hospitals and its relationship with psychological capital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About