2020
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/abb2d3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum and Addendum: Helium flux effects on bubble growth and surface morphology in plasma-facing tungsten from large-scale molecular dynamics simulations (2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 066035)

Abstract: Two of the simulations discussed in a prior article (Hammond et al 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 066035) were affected by a simulation glitch. We repeated the affected calculations and discuss them here. The overall conclusions are essentially unchanged, though the details are different. In particular, observations that we referred to as ‘concerted bursting’ were caused primarily by non-physical heating and cooling applied by the thermostat after most atoms’ velocities were deleted (for reasons that are not known for c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These nanotendrils are the precursor to the surface nanostructure that eventually grows to form the fuzz-like structure on the PFC surface [5,8,[23][24][25]. Additionally, subsurface bubble dynamics [26][27][28][29][30], dislocation loop punching [17,31,32], bubble bursting, and surface crater formation [17,[33][34][35] play important roles in the early stages of the nanotendril growth process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nanotendrils are the precursor to the surface nanostructure that eventually grows to form the fuzz-like structure on the PFC surface [5,8,[23][24][25]. Additionally, subsurface bubble dynamics [26][27][28][29][30], dislocation loop punching [17,31,32], bubble bursting, and surface crater formation [17,[33][34][35] play important roles in the early stages of the nanotendril growth process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, bubble rupture at the surface causes recession of the surface. Figure 9 shows a visualization of snapshots from the top view for large-scale, long-term MD simulations reported by Hammond et al [74,115]. Surface islands and relatively large holes can be clearly seen from this image.…”
Section: Evolution Of Surface Morphology and Fuzz Formationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Among those potentials, the most reliable parametrization is the Juslin–Wirth (JW) potential parametrization, which is based on the embedded-atom method (EAM) potential of Finnis and Sinclair with subsequent short-range modifications by Ackland and Thetford and further extreme-short-range modifications by Juslin and Wirth . This potential parametrization has been used successfully in plasma-exposed tungsten models under various plasma exposure conditions and has been employed in large-scale MD simulations to investigate the evolution of the near-surface region of PFC tungsten under He irradiation conditions that approach typical fusion reactor operating conditions. ,,, Also, we have used the JW parametrization in our recent study of the elastic properties of PFC tungsten; hence, predictions of tungsten elastic properties by the SNAP and JW parametrizations merit a proper comprehensive comparison before setting out to explore mechanical behavior beyond the elastic regime. In addition, we have compared these interatomic potential results with predictions from first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations within the quasi-harmonic approximation (DFT-QHA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%