Correspondence between self-reported and objective measures of driving exposure and patterns in older drivers

Blanchard, Robin A.; Myers, Anita M.; Porter, Michelle M.

doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.018

Cited by 144 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In both studies, the period of interest was the one week prior to the self-reporting. Blanchard et al [3] found similar results with older drivers. Overall, self-reports of travel distances were not systematically biased compared to those recorded by the Car Chips.…”

Section: Self-reports (Sr)supporting

confidence: 74%

Are young drivers as careful as they deem? In vehicle data recorders and self reports evaluations

Albert

Lotan²,

Toledo

et al. 2014

Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to explore the driving behavior of young drivers few years after licensure based on two different evaluation approaches, which are used in a complementary manner. The evaluation was done with respect to driving exposure and trip safety. Methods The evaluation is based on two data collection approaches, which were compiled for the same trips: The first, In Vehicle Data Recorders (IVDR), which were installed in the young drivers' vehicles for a study period of 8 months. The second, Self-Reports (SR), which were provided by the young drivers at random times throughout the study period. These data have been compared and used in a complementary manner in order to provide an understanding of participants' driving behavior. Results The results show high correlation of driving exposure which was self-reported and these obtained from IVDR. The results also indicate that young drivers clearly perceived themselves as being safer drivers than they are, according to IVDR findings. In addition variables available only in the SR e.g., the presence of passenger in the car were found to affect the trip risk level. Conclusions The analysis obtained should be considered as exemplifying the potential of what may be accomplished and understood using these evaluation approaches.

show abstract

Section: Self-reports (Sr)supporting

confidence: 74%

Are young drivers as careful as they deem? In vehicle data recorders and self reports evaluations

Albert

Lotan²,

Toledo

et al. 2014

Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The MoCA has shown greater sensitivity and specificity than the MMSE in detecting mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease (Luis et al, 2009), but to date there have been no published studies of the association of the MoCA with driving in a large sample of healthy older adults. A cognitive assessment tool that has been studied more extensively with respect to driving performance in older adults is the Trail Making Test, parts A and B (Brown & Ott, 2004, Grace et al, 2005, Reger et al, 2004.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between cognitive performance, perceptions of driving comfort and abilities, and self-reported driving restrictions among healthy older drivers

Rapoport

Naglie

Weegar

et al. 2013

Accident Analysis & Prevention

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between cognitive performance, driver perceptions and self-reported driving restrictions. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on baseline data from Candrive II, a five-year prospective cohort study of 928 The baseline data indicates this cohort is largely a cognitively intact group. Univariate regression analysis showed that longer Trails A and B completion times were significantly, but only modestly associated with reduced driving frequency and perceived driving abilities and comfort, as well as a significant tendency to avoid more difficult driving situations (all p < .05). Most of these associations persisted after adjusting for age and sex, as well as indicators of health, vision, mood and physical functioning. Exceptions were Trails A and B completion times and situational driving frequency, as well as time to complete Trails B and current driving restrictions. After adjusting for the confounding factors, the total MoCA score was not associated with any of the driving measure scores while the number of errors on Trails A was significantly associated only with situational driving frequency and number of errors on Trails B was significantly associated only with situational driving avoidance. Prospective follow-up will permit examination of whether baseline cognition or changes in cognition are associated with changes in driver perceptions, actual driving restrictions and on-road driving outcomes (e.g., crashes, violations) over time.4

show abstract

“…Self-report data used for evaluating driving exposure is prone to errors due to recall or memory bias and possible capacity limitations associated with aging or medical conditions (Charlton et al, 2010). Recent studies have demonstrated discrepancies between self-reported driving behaviours and objectively derived driving data (Blanchard, Myers & Porter, 2010;Huebner, Porter & Marshall, 2006;Marshall et al, 2007;Myers, Trang & Crizzle, 2011). An additional challenge to collection of objective measures of driving performance is that using an unfamiliar vehicle and set instructions can cause test anxiety and may fail to adequately assess drivers' navigational and problem solving skills (Lundberg & Hakamies-Blomquist, 2003, Hunt, Murphy, Carr, Duchek, Buckles, & Morris, 1997Malloon & Wood, 2004).…”

Section: Older Driversmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and evaluation of a Driving Observation Schedule (DOS) to study everyday driving performance of older drivers

Vlahodimitrakou

Charlton

Langford

et al. 2013

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Correspondence between self-reported and objective measures of driving exposure and patterns in older drivers

Cited by 144 publications

References 33 publications

Are young drivers as careful as they deem? In vehicle data recorders and self reports evaluations

Are young drivers as careful as they deem? In vehicle data recorders and self reports evaluations

The relationship between cognitive performance, perceptions of driving comfort and abilities, and self-reported driving restrictions among healthy older drivers

Development and evaluation of a Driving Observation Schedule (DOS) to study everyday driving performance of older drivers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About