2022
DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correspondence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the actual effect of SRF on visual function in MNV3 remains questionable, as Su et al [25] reported that SRF occurs eccentrically at the border of the PED and only in eyes with pronounced IRF. With respect to the quantitative and topographic changes of the IRF in relation to the progression of the lesion in the study of Sharma et al [12], there is ongoing debate about a better visual prognosis of the isolated IRF in type 3 eyes [11,12].…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the actual effect of SRF on visual function in MNV3 remains questionable, as Su et al [25] reported that SRF occurs eccentrically at the border of the PED and only in eyes with pronounced IRF. With respect to the quantitative and topographic changes of the IRF in relation to the progression of the lesion in the study of Sharma et al [12], there is ongoing debate about a better visual prognosis of the isolated IRF in type 3 eyes [11,12].…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact characterization of this type is important as recent multimodal imaging studies have shown that the frequency of MNV3 lesions in nAMD appears to be significantly higher than previously thought. Moreover, for this macular neovascularization (MNV) type, the validity of established optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers such as intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal (SRF) fluid needs to be re-evaluated [8][9][10][11][12]. The current pathophysiological understanding of MNV3 and its implications for current patient care and future clinical research directions are described in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%