Correspondence arising: Modafinil for cognitive neuroenhancement in health non-sleep-deprived-subjects

Nicholson, Paul J

doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.024

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ginkgo biloba and fish oil), have also been investigated as potential CEs [2,3]. The effectiveness of CEs in healthy people and their efficacy beyond laboratory settings is unclear [1,[4][5][6]. Modafinil and methylphenidate have the most established evidence suggesting some cognitive efficacy in healthy people [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study drug use among university students in Western Australia: Results of a web survey and their policy and practice implications

Nelson

Jensen

Lenton

2020

Drug and Alcohol Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction and Aims Recent research and anecdotal reports suggest increased use of ‘study drugs’ or cognitive enhancers (CE) by university students. Evidence suggests students who use CEs tend to perceive them as effective, but whether CEs improve cognition in healthy individuals is unclear and any drug use carries a risk of harm. Two previous studies have investigated the prevalence of use in Australian university student samples and neither assessed university system factors which may contribute to use. Design and Methods During 2016, a convenience sample of 2133 18–29‐year‐old students across all five Western Australian universities completed a quantitative anonymous web survey targeting both users and non‐users of CE. Results Of the final sample, 7.9% reported use of a prescription drug for CE purposes in the last 12 months. Prescription CE use was predicted by greater frequency of illicit drug use and among students who reported they had not had a take‐home exam in the last 12 months. Rates of use and predictors of over the counter (28.6%) and illicit drugs (2.4%) were predicted by different individual and contextual factors. There were high rates of reporting positive effects from CE use, but although negative effects were reported less commonly, they were not trivial. Discussion and Conclusions These findings have implications for university policy and university health services raising the issue with students and potentially providing clinical interventions addressing CE use. Further research should include representative samples and address both system and individual variables in understanding patterns of CE use among students.

show abstract