1993
DOI: 10.1016/0950-3293(93)90164-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of sensory and instrumental meat tenderness values as affected by sampling techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Para a análise, foram utilizados pelo menos seis cilindros de 1,27 cm de diâmetro, retirados no sentido longitudinal das fibras. A velocidade empregada foi de 5 mm s -1 , e os resultados dos picos de força foram expressos como força de cisalhamento, em quilograma (Poste et al 1993).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Para a análise, foram utilizados pelo menos seis cilindros de 1,27 cm de diâmetro, retirados no sentido longitudinal das fibras. A velocidade empregada foi de 5 mm s -1 , e os resultados dos picos de força foram expressos como força de cisalhamento, em quilograma (Poste et al 1993).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…Most authors use the Warner-Bratzler (W-B) method to determine the shear parameters (Honikel, 1997) and Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) for properties of meat related to chewiness. According to several authors (Honikel, 1997) and (Poste et al, 1993), WB and TPA tests can provide information on the textural properties due to the two structural components of meat: myofibrillar structure and connective tissue. In the TPA test, using low values of compression ratios (10-30%) of the meat samples, it is possible to determine the behaviour of myofibrillar structure without the intervention of connective tissue, because the fibres are deployed but they have not undergone deformation and using high ratios (65-85%), determining the strength of connective tissue (Lepetit and Culioli, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance of well trained panels is naturally superior to that of less trained panels, but preparation of samples is also an important factor influencing the relationship. When samples are prepared and cut in the same way for both sensory analyses and instrumental measurements, the correlation coefficient increases (Poste et al. 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%