1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1981.tb00743.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlations of Platelet Survival and Function with the Results of Two in vitro Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McGill has previously questioned the validity of studies that use the bleeding time and the linear relationship of Harker and Slichter to evaluate the efficacy of stored platelet concen trates after transfusion. 138…”
Section: There Is No Evidence That the Utility Of The Bleeding Time Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGill has previously questioned the validity of studies that use the bleeding time and the linear relationship of Harker and Slichter to evaluate the efficacy of stored platelet concen trates after transfusion. 138…”
Section: There Is No Evidence That the Utility Of The Bleeding Time Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGill has previously questioned the validity of studies that use the bleeding time and the linear relationship of Harker and Slichter to evaluate the efficacy of stored platelet concentrates after transfusion. 138 3. The bleeding time is not a specific in vivo indicator of platelet function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 [t may well be that those platelets which survive longer have the most inhibited function and, that on the other hand, platelets which survive for only a short time may, during this brief interval, be functionally effective. 11 The test of in vitro function which most closely correlates with platelet survival is probably the discoid shape of the platelets and their ability to regain this shape when incubated under more optimal conditions. 8 The spiny sphered platelets which form during storage at 4 QC survive for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%